Afghanistan vs Burkina Faso: Openness of Executive Recruitment Score
Openness of Executive Recruitment Score over time
- Afghanistan
- Burkina Faso
How they compare
Afghanistan currently reports 4 against 4 in Burkina Faso, a difference of 0.
The two have swapped places 6 times across 30 shared years of data; in 1960 it was Burkina Faso ahead.
Afghanistan ranks 1st and Burkina Faso ranks 1st of 167 countries.
Across the 6 decades both report, Afghanistan averaged higher in 4 and Burkina Faso in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Afghanistan | Burkina Faso | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 2 | 2.4 | 0.4 | Burkina Faso |
| 1970s | 0.8571 | 0 | 0.8571 | Afghanistan |
| 1980s | 4 | 0 | 4 | Afghanistan |
| 1990s | 1.33 | 0 | 1.33 | Afghanistan |
| 2000s | 0 | 0 | 0 | — |
| 2010s | 4 | 3.2 | 0.8 | Afghanistan |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher openness of executive recruitment score, Afghanistan or Burkina Faso?
- Afghanistan, at 4 against 4 in Burkina Faso as of 2018.
- What is the difference in openness of executive recruitment score between Afghanistan and Burkina Faso?
- 0, with Afghanistan ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Afghanistan and Burkina Faso?
- 30 years are reported by both, from 1960 to 2018.
- How do Afghanistan and Burkina Faso rank globally for openness of executive recruitment score?
- Afghanistan ranks 1st and Burkina Faso ranks 1st of 167 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Polity 5 (2020) – processed by Our World in Data, published as Openness of Executive Recruitment Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Indicates the extent to which recruitment for the executive is open. It ranges from executive power being seized (score of 0), over hereditary succession (score of 1), dual hereditary-open arrangements with the chief minister designated (score of 2), and dual hereditary-open arrangements with the chief minister being elected (score of 3), to executive recruitment being open (score of 4).