Malawi vs Zambia: Number of confirmed cases of tetanus, gaps filled
Malawi
8 Cases
in 2024
Zambia
7 Cases
in 2024
Malawi rank
61st
Zambia rank
64th
Number of confirmed cases of tetanus, gaps filled over time
- Malawi
- Zambia
How they compare
Malawi currently reports 8 Cases against 7 Cases in Zambia, a difference of 1 Cases.
That makes Malawi's figure about 1.1 times Zambia's.
The two have swapped places 8 times across 40 shared years of data; in 1976 it was Malawi ahead.
Malawi ranks 61st and Zambia ranks 64th of 210 countries.
Across the 6 decades both report, Malawi averaged higher in 2 and Zambia in 4.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Malawi | Zambia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1970s | 497 Cases | 454.5 Cases | 42.5 Cases | Malawi |
| 1980s | 514.43 Cases | 295.86 Cases | 218.57 Cases | Malawi |
| 1990s | 2.25 Cases | 117.88 Cases | 115.62 Cases | Zambia |
| 2000s | 8.25 Cases | 64.8 Cases | 56.55 Cases | Zambia |
| 2010s | 3.9 Cases | 7.8 Cases | 3.9 Cases | Zambia |
| 2020s | 4 Cases | 24.8 Cases | 20.8 Cases | Zambia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher number of confirmed cases of tetanus, gaps filled, Malawi or Zambia?
- Malawi, at 8 Cases against 7 Cases in Zambia as of 2024.
- What is the difference in number of confirmed cases of tetanus, gaps filled between Malawi and Zambia?
- 1 Cases, with Malawi ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Malawi and Zambia?
- 40 years are reported by both, from 1976 to 2024.
- How do Malawi and Zambia rank globally for number of confirmed cases of tetanus, gaps filled?
- Malawi ranks 61st and Zambia ranks 64th of 210 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Number of confirmed cases of tetanus, gaps filled. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Number of confirmed cases of tetanus with 777 missing years estimated by linear interpolation between the nearest real observations. Only gaps of 4 years or fewer are filled, and never beyond the first or last actual measurement — these are filled holes, not forecasts.