Congo vs Romania: Number of confirmed cases of tetanus, gaps filled
Congo
14 Cases
in 2024
Romania
12 Cases
in 2024
Congo rank
51st
Romania rank
53rd
Number of confirmed cases of tetanus, gaps filled over time
- Congo
- Romania
How they compare
Congo currently reports 14 Cases against 12 Cases in Romania, a difference of 2 Cases.
That makes Congo's figure about 1.2 times Romania's.
The two have swapped places 10 times across 46 shared years of data; in 1975 it was Congo ahead.
Congo ranks 51st and Romania ranks 53rd of 210 countries.
Across the 6 decades both report, Congo averaged higher in 3 and Romania in 3.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Congo | Romania | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1970s | 243.8 Cases | 45.8 Cases | 198 Cases | Congo |
| 1980s | 95.7 Cases | 31.7 Cases | 64 Cases | Congo |
| 1990s | 13.94 Cases | 26.88 Cases | 12.94 Cases | Romania |
| 2000s | 10.25 Cases | 11.88 Cases | 1.62 Cases | Romania |
| 2010s | 3 Cases | 8.35 Cases | 5.35 Cases | Romania |
| 2020s | 21.6 Cases | 5.1 Cases | 16.5 Cases | Congo |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher number of confirmed cases of tetanus, gaps filled, Congo or Romania?
- Congo, at 14 Cases against 12 Cases in Romania as of 2024.
- What is the difference in number of confirmed cases of tetanus, gaps filled between Congo and Romania?
- 2 Cases, with Congo ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Congo and Romania?
- 46 years are reported by both, from 1975 to 2024.
- How do Congo and Romania rank globally for number of confirmed cases of tetanus, gaps filled?
- Congo ranks 51st and Romania ranks 53rd of 210 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Number of confirmed cases of tetanus, gaps filled. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Number of confirmed cases of tetanus with 777 missing years estimated by linear interpolation between the nearest real observations. Only gaps of 4 years or fewer are filled, and never beyond the first or last actual measurement — these are filled holes, not forecasts.