Congo vs Ecuador: Number of confirmed cases of tetanus, gaps filled
Congo
14 Cases
in 2024
Ecuador
13 Cases
in 2024
Congo rank
51st
Ecuador rank
52nd
Number of confirmed cases of tetanus, gaps filled over time
- Congo
- Ecuador
How they compare
Congo currently reports 14 Cases against 13 Cases in Ecuador, a difference of 1 Cases.
That makes Congo's figure about 1.1 times Ecuador's.
The two have swapped places 12 times across 47 shared years of data; in 1974 it was Congo ahead.
Congo ranks 51st and Ecuador ranks 52nd of 210 countries.
Across the 6 decades both report, Congo averaged higher in 2 and Ecuador in 4.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Congo | Ecuador | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1970s | 237.5 Cases | 147.33 Cases | 90.17 Cases | Congo |
| 1980s | 95.7 Cases | 141.3 Cases | 45.6 Cases | Ecuador |
| 1990s | 13.94 Cases | 129.88 Cases | 115.94 Cases | Ecuador |
| 2000s | 10.25 Cases | 17.31 Cases | 7.06 Cases | Ecuador |
| 2010s | 3 Cases | 26.8 Cases | 23.8 Cases | Ecuador |
| 2020s | 21.6 Cases | 7.5 Cases | 14.1 Cases | Congo |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher number of confirmed cases of tetanus, gaps filled, Congo or Ecuador?
- Congo, at 14 Cases against 13 Cases in Ecuador as of 2024.
- What is the difference in number of confirmed cases of tetanus, gaps filled between Congo and Ecuador?
- 1 Cases, with Congo ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Congo and Ecuador?
- 47 years are reported by both, from 1974 to 2024.
- How do Congo and Ecuador rank globally for number of confirmed cases of tetanus, gaps filled?
- Congo ranks 51st and Ecuador ranks 52nd of 210 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Number of confirmed cases of tetanus, gaps filled. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Number of confirmed cases of tetanus with 777 missing years estimated by linear interpolation between the nearest real observations. Only gaps of 4 years or fewer are filled, and never beyond the first or last actual measurement — these are filled holes, not forecasts.