Nauru vs Seychelles: Malnutrition: Number of children who are stunted

Nauru
200
in 2024
Seychelles
600
in 2024
Nauru rank
159th
Seychelles rank
157th

Malnutrition: Number of children who are stunted over time

  • Nauru
  • Seychelles
200400600800200020122024

How they compare

Seychelles currently reports 600 against 200 in Nauru, a difference of 400.

That makes Seychelles's figure about 3.0 times Nauru's.

Across all 25 years both countries report, Seychelles has been ahead every year.

Nauru ranks 159th and Seychelles ranks 157th of 162 countries.

Seychelles has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Nauru Seychelles Difference Ahead
2000s 300 680 380 Seychelles
2010s 300 600 300 Seychelles
2020s 200 580 380 Seychelles

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher malnutrition: number of children who are stunted, Nauru or Seychelles?
Seychelles, at 600 against 200 in Nauru as of 2024.
What is the difference in malnutrition: number of children who are stunted between Nauru and Seychelles?
400, with Seychelles ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Nauru and Seychelles?
25 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2024.
How do Nauru and Seychelles rank globally for malnutrition: number of children who are stunted?
Nauru ranks 159th and Seychelles ranks 157th of 162 countries.
Where does this data come from?
World Health Organization - Global Health Observatory (2026) – with minor processing by Our World in Data, published as Malnutrition: Number of children who are stunted. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Malnutrition: Number of children who are stunted
Source
World Health Organization - Global Health Observatory (2026) – with minor processing by Our World in Data
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (Our World in Data)
Coverage
162 places, 4,050 data points, 2000–2024
Last refreshed

The number of children younger than five who are stunted – significantly shorter than the average for their age, as a consequence of poor nutrition or repeated infection.