Jamaica vs Uruguay: Malnutrition: Number of children who are stunted

Jamaica
11,200
in 2024
Uruguay
11,100
in 2024
Jamaica rank
122nd
Uruguay rank
123rd

Malnutrition: Number of children who are stunted over time

  • Jamaica
  • Uruguay
10.0k20.0k30.0k40.0k200020122024

How they compare

Jamaica currently reports 11,200 against 11,100 in Uruguay, a difference of 100.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 25 shared years of data; in 2000 it was Uruguay ahead.

Jamaica ranks 122nd and Uruguay ranks 123rd of 162 countries.

Uruguay has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Jamaica Uruguay Difference Ahead
2000s 16,370 33,920 17,550 Uruguay
2010s 12,410 18,980 6,570 Uruguay
2020s 11,100 12,080 980 Uruguay

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher malnutrition: number of children who are stunted, Jamaica or Uruguay?
Jamaica, at 11,200 against 11,100 in Uruguay as of 2024.
What is the difference in malnutrition: number of children who are stunted between Jamaica and Uruguay?
100, with Jamaica ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Jamaica and Uruguay?
25 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2024.
How do Jamaica and Uruguay rank globally for malnutrition: number of children who are stunted?
Jamaica ranks 122nd and Uruguay ranks 123rd of 162 countries.
Where does this data come from?
World Health Organization - Global Health Observatory (2026) – with minor processing by Our World in Data, published as Malnutrition: Number of children who are stunted. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Malnutrition: Number of children who are stunted
Source
World Health Organization - Global Health Observatory (2026) – with minor processing by Our World in Data
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (Our World in Data)
Coverage
162 places, 4,050 data points, 2000–2024
Last refreshed

The number of children younger than five who are stunted – significantly shorter than the average for their age, as a consequence of poor nutrition or repeated infection.