Armenia vs Uruguay: Malnutrition: Number of children who are stunted

Armenia
10,900
in 2024
Uruguay
11,100
in 2024
Armenia rank
125th
Uruguay rank
123rd

Malnutrition: Number of children who are stunted over time

  • Armenia
  • Uruguay
10.0k20.0k30.0k40.0k200020122024

How they compare

Uruguay currently reports 11,100 against 10,900 in Armenia, a difference of 200.

The two have swapped places 2 times across 25 shared years of data; in 2000 it was Uruguay ahead.

Armenia ranks 125th and Uruguay ranks 123rd of 162 countries.

Armenia has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Armenia Uruguay Difference Ahead
2000s 35,650 33,920 1,730 Armenia
2010s 25,080 18,980 6,100 Armenia
2020s 12,140 12,080 60 Armenia

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher malnutrition: number of children who are stunted, Armenia or Uruguay?
Uruguay, at 11,100 against 10,900 in Armenia as of 2024.
What is the difference in malnutrition: number of children who are stunted between Armenia and Uruguay?
200, with Uruguay ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Armenia and Uruguay?
25 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2024.
How do Armenia and Uruguay rank globally for malnutrition: number of children who are stunted?
Armenia ranks 125th and Uruguay ranks 123rd of 162 countries.
Where does this data come from?
World Health Organization - Global Health Observatory (2026) – with minor processing by Our World in Data, published as Malnutrition: Number of children who are stunted. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Malnutrition: Number of children who are stunted
Source
World Health Organization - Global Health Observatory (2026) – with minor processing by Our World in Data
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (Our World in Data)
Coverage
162 places, 4,050 data points, 2000–2024
Last refreshed

The number of children younger than five who are stunted – significantly shorter than the average for their age, as a consequence of poor nutrition or repeated infection.