Serbia vs Suriname: Nonrenewable natural capital, total

Serbia
11.24 billion real chained 2019 US$
in 2020
Suriname
10.25 billion real chained 2019 US$
in 2020
Serbia rank
69th
Suriname rank
71st

Nonrenewable natural capital, total over time

  • Serbia
  • Suriname
010.0B20.0B30.0B199520072020

How they compare

Serbia currently reports 11.24 billion real chained 2019 US$ against 10.25 billion real chained 2019 US$ in Suriname, a difference of 983.70 million real chained 2019 US$.

That makes Serbia's figure about 1.1 times Suriname's.

The two have swapped places 3 times across 14 shared years of data; in 2007 it was Suriname ahead.

Serbia ranks 69th and Suriname ranks 71st of 151 countries.

Across the 3 decades both report, Serbia averaged higher in 1 and Suriname in 2.

Head to head by decade

Decade Serbia Suriname Difference Ahead
2000s 14.30 billion real chained 2019 US$ 16.33 billion real chained 2019 US$ 2.04 billion real chained 2019 US$ Suriname
2010s 12.42 billion real chained 2019 US$ 13.06 billion real chained 2019 US$ 637.22 million real chained 2019 US$ Suriname
2020s 11.24 billion real chained 2019 US$ 10.25 billion real chained 2019 US$ 983.70 million real chained 2019 US$ Serbia

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher nonrenewable natural capital, total, Serbia or Suriname?
Serbia, at 11.24 billion real chained 2019 US$ against 10.25 billion real chained 2019 US$ in Suriname as of 2020.
What is the difference in nonrenewable natural capital, total between Serbia and Suriname?
983.70 million real chained 2019 US$, with Serbia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Serbia and Suriname?
14 years are reported by both, from 2007 to 2020.
How do Serbia and Suriname rank globally for nonrenewable natural capital, total?
Serbia ranks 69th and Suriname ranks 71st of 151 countries.
Where does this data come from?
World Bank. 2021. The Changing Wealth of Nations 2021: Managing Assets for the Future. Washington, DC: World Bank. doi:10.1596/978-1-4648-1590-4, published as Nonrenewable natural capital, total (real chained 2019 US$). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Serbia vs Suriname: Nonrenewable natural capital, total. Statizoid, drawing on World Bank. 2021. The Changing Wealth of Nations 2021: Managing Assets for the Future. Washington, DC: World Bank. doi:10.1596/978-1-4648-1590-4. Retrieved 20 August 2026, from https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/nonrenewable-natural-capital-total-real-chained-2019-us/serbia/suriname/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/nonrenewable-natural-capital-total-real-chained-2019-us/serbia/suriname/">Serbia vs Suriname: Nonrenewable natural capital, total</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Nonrenewable natural capital, total (real chained 2019 US$)
Unit
real chained 2019 US$
Source
World Bank. 2021. The Changing Wealth of Nations 2021: Managing Assets for the Future. Washington, DC: World Bank. doi:10.1596/978-1-4648-1590-4
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
151 places, 3,885 data points, 1995–2020
Last refreshed

Natural capital includes the valuation of renewable and nonrenewable natural capital. Renewable natural capital includes agricultural land (cropland and pastureland), forests (timber, and three ecosystem services: water, recretion and non-wood forest products), protected areas, mangroves and fisheries. Nonrenewable natural capital includes fossil fuel energy (oil, gas, hard and soft coal) and minerals (bauxite, copper, gold, iron ore, lead, nickel, phosphate, silver, tin, and zinc),Values are measured at market exchange rates in constant 2018 US dollars, using a country-specific GDP deflator.