Kyrgyzstan vs Serbia: Nonrenewable natural capital, total

Kyrgyzstan
11.84 billion real chained 2019 US$
in 2020
Serbia
11.24 billion real chained 2019 US$
in 2020
Kyrgyzstan rank
68th
Serbia rank
69th

Nonrenewable natural capital, total over time

  • Kyrgyzstan
  • Serbia
05.0B10.0B15.0B199520072020

How they compare

Kyrgyzstan currently reports 11.84 billion real chained 2019 US$ against 11.24 billion real chained 2019 US$ in Serbia, a difference of 608.90 million real chained 2019 US$.

That makes Kyrgyzstan's figure about 1.1 times Serbia's.

Across all 14 years both countries report, Kyrgyzstan has been ahead every year.

Kyrgyzstan ranks 68th and Serbia ranks 69th of 151 countries.

Kyrgyzstan has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Kyrgyzstan Serbia Difference Ahead
2000s 15.69 billion real chained 2019 US$ 14.30 billion real chained 2019 US$ 1.40 billion real chained 2019 US$ Kyrgyzstan
2010s 14.04 billion real chained 2019 US$ 12.42 billion real chained 2019 US$ 1.62 billion real chained 2019 US$ Kyrgyzstan
2020s 11.84 billion real chained 2019 US$ 11.24 billion real chained 2019 US$ 608.90 million real chained 2019 US$ Kyrgyzstan

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher nonrenewable natural capital, total, Kyrgyzstan or Serbia?
Kyrgyzstan, at 11.84 billion real chained 2019 US$ against 11.24 billion real chained 2019 US$ in Serbia as of 2020.
What is the difference in nonrenewable natural capital, total between Kyrgyzstan and Serbia?
608.90 million real chained 2019 US$, with Kyrgyzstan ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Kyrgyzstan and Serbia?
14 years are reported by both, from 2007 to 2020.
How do Kyrgyzstan and Serbia rank globally for nonrenewable natural capital, total?
Kyrgyzstan ranks 68th and Serbia ranks 69th of 151 countries.
Where does this data come from?
World Bank. 2021. The Changing Wealth of Nations 2021: Managing Assets for the Future. Washington, DC: World Bank. doi:10.1596/978-1-4648-1590-4, published as Nonrenewable natural capital, total (real chained 2019 US$). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Kyrgyzstan vs Serbia: Nonrenewable natural capital, total. Statizoid, drawing on World Bank. 2021. The Changing Wealth of Nations 2021: Managing Assets for the Future. Washington, DC: World Bank. doi:10.1596/978-1-4648-1590-4. Retrieved 28 August 2026, from https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/nonrenewable-natural-capital-total-real-chained-2019-us/kyrgyz-republic/serbia/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/nonrenewable-natural-capital-total-real-chained-2019-us/kyrgyz-republic/serbia/">Kyrgyzstan vs Serbia: Nonrenewable natural capital, total</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Nonrenewable natural capital, total (real chained 2019 US$)
Unit
real chained 2019 US$
Source
World Bank. 2021. The Changing Wealth of Nations 2021: Managing Assets for the Future. Washington, DC: World Bank. doi:10.1596/978-1-4648-1590-4
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
151 places, 3,885 data points, 1995–2020
Last refreshed

Natural capital includes the valuation of renewable and nonrenewable natural capital. Renewable natural capital includes agricultural land (cropland and pastureland), forests (timber, and three ecosystem services: water, recretion and non-wood forest products), protected areas, mangroves and fisheries. Nonrenewable natural capital includes fossil fuel energy (oil, gas, hard and soft coal) and minerals (bauxite, copper, gold, iron ore, lead, nickel, phosphate, silver, tin, and zinc),Values are measured at market exchange rates in constant 2018 US dollars, using a country-specific GDP deflator.