Sudan vs Zimbabwe: Nonrenewable natural capital, total
Sudan
21.63 billion current US$
in 2020
Zimbabwe
17.91 billion current US$
in 2020
Sudan rank
46th
Zimbabwe rank
49th
Nonrenewable natural capital, total over time
- Sudan
- Zimbabwe
How they compare
Sudan currently reports 21.63 billion current US$ against 17.91 billion current US$ in Zimbabwe, a difference of 3.72 billion current US$.
That makes Sudan's figure about 1.2 times Zimbabwe's.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 9 shared years of data; in 2012 it was Sudan ahead.
Sudan ranks 46th and Zimbabwe ranks 49th of 150 countries.
Sudan has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Sudan | Zimbabwe | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 26.14 billion current US$ | 6.52 billion current US$ | 19.62 billion current US$ | Sudan |
| 2020s | 21.63 billion current US$ | 17.91 billion current US$ | 3.72 billion current US$ | Sudan |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher nonrenewable natural capital, total, Sudan or Zimbabwe?
- Sudan, at 21.63 billion current US$ against 17.91 billion current US$ in Zimbabwe as of 2020.
- What is the difference in nonrenewable natural capital, total between Sudan and Zimbabwe?
- 3.72 billion current US$, with Sudan ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Sudan and Zimbabwe?
- 9 years are reported by both, from 2012 to 2020.
- How do Sudan and Zimbabwe rank globally for nonrenewable natural capital, total?
- Sudan ranks 46th and Zimbabwe ranks 49th of 150 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Nonrenewable natural capital, total (current US$). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.