Sudan vs Zambia: Nonrenewable natural capital, total
Sudan
21.63 billion current US$
in 2020
Zambia
20.88 billion current US$
in 2020
Sudan rank
46th
Zambia rank
47th
Nonrenewable natural capital, total over time
- Sudan
- Zambia
How they compare
Sudan currently reports 21.63 billion current US$ against 20.88 billion current US$ in Zambia, a difference of 742.00 million current US$.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 9 shared years of data; in 2012 it was Sudan ahead.
Sudan ranks 46th and Zambia ranks 47th of 150 countries.
Across the 2 decades both report, Sudan averaged higher in 1 and Zambia in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Sudan | Zambia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 26.14 billion current US$ | 26.79 billion current US$ | 644.58 million current US$ | Zambia |
| 2020s | 21.63 billion current US$ | 20.88 billion current US$ | 742.00 million current US$ | Sudan |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher nonrenewable natural capital, total, Sudan or Zambia?
- Sudan, at 21.63 billion current US$ against 20.88 billion current US$ in Zambia as of 2020.
- What is the difference in nonrenewable natural capital, total between Sudan and Zambia?
- 742.00 million current US$, with Sudan ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Sudan and Zambia?
- 9 years are reported by both, from 2012 to 2020.
- How do Sudan and Zambia rank globally for nonrenewable natural capital, total?
- Sudan ranks 46th and Zambia ranks 47th of 150 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Nonrenewable natural capital, total (current US$). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.