Congo vs Ecuador: Nonrenewable natural capital, total
Congo
28.21 billion current US$
in 2020
Ecuador
27.61 billion current US$
in 2020
Congo rank
40th
Ecuador rank
41st
Nonrenewable natural capital, total over time
- Congo
- Ecuador
How they compare
Congo currently reports 28.21 billion current US$ against 27.61 billion current US$ in Ecuador, a difference of 600.80 million current US$.
The two have swapped places 5 times across 26 shared years of data; in 1995 it was Ecuador ahead.
Congo ranks 40th and Ecuador ranks 41st of 150 countries.
Across the 4 decades both report, Congo averaged higher in 1 and Ecuador in 3.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Congo | Ecuador | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 11.34 billion current US$ | 16.57 billion current US$ | 5.23 billion current US$ | Ecuador |
| 2000s | 42.98 billion current US$ | 69.95 billion current US$ | 26.97 billion current US$ | Ecuador |
| 2010s | 74.41 billion current US$ | 83.54 billion current US$ | 9.13 billion current US$ | Ecuador |
| 2020s | 28.21 billion current US$ | 27.61 billion current US$ | 600.80 million current US$ | Congo |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher nonrenewable natural capital, total, Congo or Ecuador?
- Congo, at 28.21 billion current US$ against 27.61 billion current US$ in Ecuador as of 2020.
- What is the difference in nonrenewable natural capital, total between Congo and Ecuador?
- 600.80 million current US$, with Congo ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Congo and Ecuador?
- 26 years are reported by both, from 1995 to 2020.
- How do Congo and Ecuador rank globally for nonrenewable natural capital, total?
- Congo ranks 40th and Ecuador ranks 41st of 150 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Nonrenewable natural capital, total (current US$). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.