Belgium vs Sri Lanka: Nonrenewable natural capital, total
Belgium
2.54 million current US$
in 2020
Sri Lanka
0 current US$
in 2020
Belgium rank
123rd
Sri Lanka rank
126th
Nonrenewable natural capital, total over time
- Belgium
- Sri Lanka
How they compare
Belgium currently reports 2.54 million current US$ against 0 current US$ in Sri Lanka, a difference of 2.54 million current US$.
The two have swapped places 4 times across 26 shared years of data; in 1995 it was Belgium ahead.
Belgium ranks 123rd and Sri Lanka ranks 126th of 150 countries.
Across the 4 decades both report, Belgium averaged higher in 2 and Sri Lanka in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Belgium | Sri Lanka | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 359,969 current US$ | 0 current US$ | 359,969 current US$ | Belgium |
| 2000s | 140,938 current US$ | 33.93 million current US$ | 33.78 million current US$ | Sri Lanka |
| 2010s | 422,399 current US$ | 46.00 million current US$ | 45.58 million current US$ | Sri Lanka |
| 2020s | 2.54 million current US$ | 0 current US$ | 2.54 million current US$ | Belgium |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher nonrenewable natural capital, total, Belgium or Sri Lanka?
- Belgium, at 2.54 million current US$ against 0 current US$ in Sri Lanka as of 2020.
- What is the difference in nonrenewable natural capital, total between Belgium and Sri Lanka?
- 2.54 million current US$, with Belgium ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Belgium and Sri Lanka?
- 26 years are reported by both, from 1995 to 2020.
- How do Belgium and Sri Lanka rank globally for nonrenewable natural capital, total?
- Belgium ranks 123rd and Sri Lanka ranks 126th of 150 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Nonrenewable natural capital, total (current US$). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.