Belgium vs Chad: Nonrenewable natural capital, total
Belgium
2.54 million current US$
in 2020
Chad
8.30 million current US$
in 2020
Belgium rank
123rd
Chad rank
122nd
Nonrenewable natural capital, total over time
- Belgium
- Chad
How they compare
Chad currently reports 8.30 million current US$ against 2.54 million current US$ in Belgium, a difference of 5.76 million current US$.
That makes Chad's figure about 3.3 times Belgium's.
The two have swapped places 3 times across 26 shared years of data; in 1995 it was Belgium ahead.
Belgium ranks 123rd and Chad ranks 122nd of 150 countries.
Across the 4 decades both report, Belgium averaged higher in 1 and Chad in 3.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Belgium | Chad | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 359,969 current US$ | 0 current US$ | 359,969 current US$ | Belgium |
| 2000s | 140,938 current US$ | 16.21 billion current US$ | 16.21 billion current US$ | Chad |
| 2010s | 422,399 current US$ | 15.81 billion current US$ | 15.81 billion current US$ | Chad |
| 2020s | 2.54 million current US$ | 8.30 million current US$ | 5.76 million current US$ | Chad |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher nonrenewable natural capital, total, Belgium or Chad?
- Chad, at 8.30 million current US$ against 2.54 million current US$ in Belgium as of 2020.
- What is the difference in nonrenewable natural capital, total between Belgium and Chad?
- 5.76 million current US$, with Chad ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Belgium and Chad?
- 26 years are reported by both, from 1995 to 2020.
- How do Belgium and Chad rank globally for nonrenewable natural capital, total?
- Belgium ranks 123rd and Chad ranks 122nd of 150 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Nonrenewable natural capital, total (current US$). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.