Togo vs Zimbabwe: Nonrenewable natural capital per capita, total

Togo
1,101 real chained 2019 US$
in 2020
Zimbabwe
925.92 real chained 2019 US$
in 2020
Togo rank
59th
Zimbabwe rank
62nd

Nonrenewable natural capital per capita, total over time

  • Togo
  • Zimbabwe
1.0k1.5k2.0k2.5k3.0k199520072020

How they compare

Togo currently reports 1,101 real chained 2019 US$ against 925.92 real chained 2019 US$ in Zimbabwe, a difference of 175.08 real chained 2019 US$.

That makes Togo's figure about 1.2 times Zimbabwe's.

Across all 26 years both countries report, Togo has been ahead every year.

Togo ranks 59th and Zimbabwe ranks 62nd of 151 countries.

Togo has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Togo Zimbabwe Difference Ahead
1990s 2,964 real chained 2019 US$ 1,757 real chained 2019 US$ 1,208 real chained 2019 US$ Togo
2000s 2,511 real chained 2019 US$ 1,252 real chained 2019 US$ 1,259 real chained 2019 US$ Togo
2010s 1,671 real chained 2019 US$ 1,113 real chained 2019 US$ 557.76 real chained 2019 US$ Togo
2020s 1,101 real chained 2019 US$ 925.92 real chained 2019 US$ 175.52 real chained 2019 US$ Togo

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher nonrenewable natural capital per capita, total, Togo or Zimbabwe?
Togo, at 1,101 real chained 2019 US$ against 925.92 real chained 2019 US$ in Zimbabwe as of 2020.
What is the difference in nonrenewable natural capital per capita, total between Togo and Zimbabwe?
175.08 real chained 2019 US$, with Togo ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Togo and Zimbabwe?
26 years are reported by both, from 1995 to 2020.
How do Togo and Zimbabwe rank globally for nonrenewable natural capital per capita, total?
Togo ranks 59th and Zimbabwe ranks 62nd of 151 countries.
Where does this data come from?
World Bank. 2021. The Changing Wealth of Nations 2021: Managing Assets for the Future. Washington, DC: World Bank. doi:10.1596/978-1-4648-1590-4, published as Nonrenewable natural capital per capita, total (real chained 2019 US$). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Togo vs Zimbabwe: Nonrenewable natural capital per capita, total. Statizoid, drawing on World Bank. 2021. The Changing Wealth of Nations 2021: Managing Assets for the Future. Washington, DC: World Bank. doi:10.1596/978-1-4648-1590-4. Retrieved 22 August 2026, from https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/nonrenewable-natural-capital-per-capita-total-real-chained-2019-us/togo/zimbabwe/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/nonrenewable-natural-capital-per-capita-total-real-chained-2019-us/togo/zimbabwe/">Togo vs Zimbabwe: Nonrenewable natural capital per capita, total</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Nonrenewable natural capital per capita, total (real chained 2019 US$)
Unit
real chained 2019 US$
Source
World Bank. 2021. The Changing Wealth of Nations 2021: Managing Assets for the Future. Washington, DC: World Bank. doi:10.1596/978-1-4648-1590-4
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
151 places, 3,885 data points, 1995–2020
Last refreshed

Natural capital includes the valuation of renewable and nonrenewable natural capital. Renewable natural capital includes agricultural land (cropland and pastureland), forests (timber, and three ecosystem services: water, recretion and non-wood forest products), protected areas, mangroves and fisheries. Nonrenewable natural capital includes fossil fuel energy (oil, gas, hard and soft coal) and minerals (bauxite, copper, gold, iron ore, lead, nickel, phosphate, silver, tin, and zinc),Values are measured at market exchange rates in constant 2018 US dollars, using a country-specific GDP deflator.