Serbia vs Zambia: Nonrenewable natural capital per capita, total

Serbia
1,629 real chained 2019 US$
in 2020
Zambia
1,536 real chained 2019 US$
in 2020
Serbia rank
49th
Zambia rank
51st

Nonrenewable natural capital per capita, total over time

  • Serbia
  • Zambia
1.0k2.0k3.0k4.0k5.0k6.0k199520072020

How they compare

Serbia currently reports 1,629 real chained 2019 US$ against 1,536 real chained 2019 US$ in Zambia, a difference of 93 real chained 2019 US$.

That makes Serbia's figure about 1.1 times Zambia's.

The two have swapped places 3 times across 14 shared years of data; in 2007 it was Zambia ahead.

Serbia ranks 49th and Zambia ranks 51st of 151 countries.

Across the 3 decades both report, Serbia averaged higher in 1 and Zambia in 2.

Head to head by decade

Decade Serbia Zambia Difference Ahead
2000s 1,945 real chained 2019 US$ 2,137 real chained 2019 US$ 192.01 real chained 2019 US$ Zambia
2010s 1,744 real chained 2019 US$ 1,763 real chained 2019 US$ 19.33 real chained 2019 US$ Zambia
2020s 1,629 real chained 2019 US$ 1,536 real chained 2019 US$ 92.44 real chained 2019 US$ Serbia

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher nonrenewable natural capital per capita, total, Serbia or Zambia?
Serbia, at 1,629 real chained 2019 US$ against 1,536 real chained 2019 US$ in Zambia as of 2020.
What is the difference in nonrenewable natural capital per capita, total between Serbia and Zambia?
93 real chained 2019 US$, with Serbia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Serbia and Zambia?
14 years are reported by both, from 2007 to 2020.
How do Serbia and Zambia rank globally for nonrenewable natural capital per capita, total?
Serbia ranks 49th and Zambia ranks 51st of 151 countries.
Where does this data come from?
World Bank. 2021. The Changing Wealth of Nations 2021: Managing Assets for the Future. Washington, DC: World Bank. doi:10.1596/978-1-4648-1590-4, published as Nonrenewable natural capital per capita, total (real chained 2019 US$). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Serbia vs Zambia: Nonrenewable natural capital per capita, total. Statizoid, drawing on World Bank. 2021. The Changing Wealth of Nations 2021: Managing Assets for the Future. Washington, DC: World Bank. doi:10.1596/978-1-4648-1590-4. Retrieved 28 August 2026, from https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/nonrenewable-natural-capital-per-capita-total-real-chained-2019-us/serbia/zambia/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/nonrenewable-natural-capital-per-capita-total-real-chained-2019-us/serbia/zambia/">Serbia vs Zambia: Nonrenewable natural capital per capita, total</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Nonrenewable natural capital per capita, total (real chained 2019 US$)
Unit
real chained 2019 US$
Source
World Bank. 2021. The Changing Wealth of Nations 2021: Managing Assets for the Future. Washington, DC: World Bank. doi:10.1596/978-1-4648-1590-4
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
151 places, 3,885 data points, 1995–2020
Last refreshed

Natural capital includes the valuation of renewable and nonrenewable natural capital. Renewable natural capital includes agricultural land (cropland and pastureland), forests (timber, and three ecosystem services: water, recretion and non-wood forest products), protected areas, mangroves and fisheries. Nonrenewable natural capital includes fossil fuel energy (oil, gas, hard and soft coal) and minerals (bauxite, copper, gold, iron ore, lead, nickel, phosphate, silver, tin, and zinc),Values are measured at market exchange rates in constant 2018 US dollars, using a country-specific GDP deflator.