Rwanda vs Slovakia: Nonrenewable natural capital per capita, total

Rwanda
88.75 real chained 2019 US$
in 2020
Slovakia
91.1 real chained 2019 US$
in 2020
Rwanda rank
111th
Slovakia rank
110th

Nonrenewable natural capital per capita, total over time

  • Rwanda
  • Slovakia
100150200250300350199520072020

How they compare

Slovakia currently reports 91.1 real chained 2019 US$ against 88.75 real chained 2019 US$ in Rwanda, a difference of 2.35 real chained 2019 US$.

The two have swapped places 3 times across 26 shared years of data; in 1995 it was Rwanda ahead.

Rwanda ranks 111th and Slovakia ranks 110th of 151 countries.

Across the 4 decades both report, Rwanda averaged higher in 3 and Slovakia in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Rwanda Slovakia Difference Ahead
1990s 267.42 real chained 2019 US$ 128.91 real chained 2019 US$ 138.51 real chained 2019 US$ Rwanda
2000s 211 real chained 2019 US$ 140.09 real chained 2019 US$ 70.91 real chained 2019 US$ Rwanda
2010s 127.14 real chained 2019 US$ 116.95 real chained 2019 US$ 10.2 real chained 2019 US$ Rwanda
2020s 88.75 real chained 2019 US$ 91.1 real chained 2019 US$ 2.35 real chained 2019 US$ Slovakia

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher nonrenewable natural capital per capita, total, Rwanda or Slovakia?
Slovakia, at 91.1 real chained 2019 US$ against 88.75 real chained 2019 US$ in Rwanda as of 2020.
What is the difference in nonrenewable natural capital per capita, total between Rwanda and Slovakia?
2.35 real chained 2019 US$, with Slovakia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Rwanda and Slovakia?
26 years are reported by both, from 1995 to 2020.
How do Rwanda and Slovakia rank globally for nonrenewable natural capital per capita, total?
Rwanda ranks 111th and Slovakia ranks 110th of 151 countries.
Where does this data come from?
World Bank. 2021. The Changing Wealth of Nations 2021: Managing Assets for the Future. Washington, DC: World Bank. doi:10.1596/978-1-4648-1590-4, published as Nonrenewable natural capital per capita, total (real chained 2019 US$). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Rwanda vs Slovakia: Nonrenewable natural capital per capita, total. Statizoid, drawing on World Bank. 2021. The Changing Wealth of Nations 2021: Managing Assets for the Future. Washington, DC: World Bank. doi:10.1596/978-1-4648-1590-4. Retrieved 25 August 2026, from https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/nonrenewable-natural-capital-per-capita-total-real-chained-2019-us/rwanda/slovak-republic/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/nonrenewable-natural-capital-per-capita-total-real-chained-2019-us/rwanda/slovak-republic/">Rwanda vs Slovakia: Nonrenewable natural capital per capita, total</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Nonrenewable natural capital per capita, total (real chained 2019 US$)
Unit
real chained 2019 US$
Source
World Bank. 2021. The Changing Wealth of Nations 2021: Managing Assets for the Future. Washington, DC: World Bank. doi:10.1596/978-1-4648-1590-4
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
151 places, 3,885 data points, 1995–2020
Last refreshed

Natural capital includes the valuation of renewable and nonrenewable natural capital. Renewable natural capital includes agricultural land (cropland and pastureland), forests (timber, and three ecosystem services: water, recretion and non-wood forest products), protected areas, mangroves and fisheries. Nonrenewable natural capital includes fossil fuel energy (oil, gas, hard and soft coal) and minerals (bauxite, copper, gold, iron ore, lead, nickel, phosphate, silver, tin, and zinc),Values are measured at market exchange rates in constant 2018 US dollars, using a country-specific GDP deflator.