Philippines vs Tanzania, United Republic of: Nonrenewable natural capital per capita, total

Philippines
390 real chained 2019 US$
in 2020
Tanzania, United Republic of
389.9 real chained 2019 US$
in 2020
Philippines rank
90th
Tanzania, United Republic of rank
91st

Nonrenewable natural capital per capita, total over time

  • Philippines
  • Tanzania, United Republic of
2505007501.0k1.2k1.5k199520072020

How they compare

Philippines currently reports 390 real chained 2019 US$ against 389.9 real chained 2019 US$ in Tanzania, United Republic of, a difference of 0.1 real chained 2019 US$.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 26 shared years of data; in 1995 it was Tanzania, United Republic of ahead.

Philippines ranks 90th and Tanzania, United Republic of ranks 91st of 151 countries.

Across the 4 decades both report, Philippines averaged higher in 1 and Tanzania, United Republic of in 3.

Head to head by decade

Decade Philippines Tanzania, United Republic of Difference Ahead
1990s 432.03 real chained 2019 US$ 1,448 real chained 2019 US$ 1,016 real chained 2019 US$ Tanzania, United Republic of
2000s 356.2 real chained 2019 US$ 1,064 real chained 2019 US$ 707.67 real chained 2019 US$ Tanzania, United Republic of
2010s 360.15 real chained 2019 US$ 563.22 real chained 2019 US$ 203.07 real chained 2019 US$ Tanzania, United Republic of
2020s 390 real chained 2019 US$ 389.9 real chained 2019 US$ 0.097 real chained 2019 US$ Philippines

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher nonrenewable natural capital per capita, total, Philippines or Tanzania, United Republic of?
Philippines, at 390 real chained 2019 US$ against 389.9 real chained 2019 US$ in Tanzania, United Republic of as of 2020.
What is the difference in nonrenewable natural capital per capita, total between Philippines and Tanzania, United Republic of?
0.1 real chained 2019 US$, with Philippines ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Philippines and Tanzania, United Republic of?
26 years are reported by both, from 1995 to 2020.
How do Philippines and Tanzania, United Republic of rank globally for nonrenewable natural capital per capita, total?
Philippines ranks 90th and Tanzania, United Republic of ranks 91st of 151 countries.
Where does this data come from?
World Bank. 2021. The Changing Wealth of Nations 2021: Managing Assets for the Future. Washington, DC: World Bank. doi:10.1596/978-1-4648-1590-4, published as Nonrenewable natural capital per capita, total (real chained 2019 US$). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Philippines vs Tanzania, United Republic of: Nonrenewable natural capital per capita, total. Statizoid, drawing on World Bank. 2021. The Changing Wealth of Nations 2021: Managing Assets for the Future. Washington, DC: World Bank. doi:10.1596/978-1-4648-1590-4. Retrieved 22 August 2026, from https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/nonrenewable-natural-capital-per-capita-total-real-chained-2019-us/philippines/tanzania/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/nonrenewable-natural-capital-per-capita-total-real-chained-2019-us/philippines/tanzania/">Philippines vs Tanzania, United Republic of: Nonrenewable natural capital per capita, total</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Nonrenewable natural capital per capita, total (real chained 2019 US$)
Unit
real chained 2019 US$
Source
World Bank. 2021. The Changing Wealth of Nations 2021: Managing Assets for the Future. Washington, DC: World Bank. doi:10.1596/978-1-4648-1590-4
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
151 places, 3,885 data points, 1995–2020
Last refreshed

Natural capital includes the valuation of renewable and nonrenewable natural capital. Renewable natural capital includes agricultural land (cropland and pastureland), forests (timber, and three ecosystem services: water, recretion and non-wood forest products), protected areas, mangroves and fisheries. Nonrenewable natural capital includes fossil fuel energy (oil, gas, hard and soft coal) and minerals (bauxite, copper, gold, iron ore, lead, nickel, phosphate, silver, tin, and zinc),Values are measured at market exchange rates in constant 2018 US dollars, using a country-specific GDP deflator.