Kyrgyzstan vs Mexico: Nonrenewable natural capital per capita, total

Kyrgyzstan
1,800 real chained 2019 US$
in 2020
Mexico
1,763 real chained 2019 US$
in 2020
Kyrgyzstan rank
41st
Mexico rank
42nd

Nonrenewable natural capital per capita, total over time

  • Kyrgyzstan
  • Mexico
2.0k4.0k6.0k8.0k10.0k199520072020

How they compare

Kyrgyzstan currently reports 1,800 real chained 2019 US$ against 1,763 real chained 2019 US$ in Mexico, a difference of 37 real chained 2019 US$.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 26 shared years of data; in 1995 it was Mexico ahead.

Kyrgyzstan ranks 41st and Mexico ranks 42nd of 151 countries.

Across the 4 decades both report, Kyrgyzstan averaged higher in 2 and Mexico in 2.

Head to head by decade

Decade Kyrgyzstan Mexico Difference Ahead
1990s 3,614 real chained 2019 US$ 8,383 real chained 2019 US$ 4,769 real chained 2019 US$ Mexico
2000s 3,102 real chained 2019 US$ 3,969 real chained 2019 US$ 866.7 real chained 2019 US$ Mexico
2010s 2,388 real chained 2019 US$ 2,199 real chained 2019 US$ 188.98 real chained 2019 US$ Kyrgyzstan
2020s 1,800 real chained 2019 US$ 1,763 real chained 2019 US$ 37.27 real chained 2019 US$ Kyrgyzstan

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher nonrenewable natural capital per capita, total, Kyrgyzstan or Mexico?
Kyrgyzstan, at 1,800 real chained 2019 US$ against 1,763 real chained 2019 US$ in Mexico as of 2020.
What is the difference in nonrenewable natural capital per capita, total between Kyrgyzstan and Mexico?
37 real chained 2019 US$, with Kyrgyzstan ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Kyrgyzstan and Mexico?
26 years are reported by both, from 1995 to 2020.
How do Kyrgyzstan and Mexico rank globally for nonrenewable natural capital per capita, total?
Kyrgyzstan ranks 41st and Mexico ranks 42nd of 151 countries.
Where does this data come from?
World Bank. 2021. The Changing Wealth of Nations 2021: Managing Assets for the Future. Washington, DC: World Bank. doi:10.1596/978-1-4648-1590-4, published as Nonrenewable natural capital per capita, total (real chained 2019 US$). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Kyrgyzstan vs Mexico: Nonrenewable natural capital per capita, total. Statizoid, drawing on World Bank. 2021. The Changing Wealth of Nations 2021: Managing Assets for the Future. Washington, DC: World Bank. doi:10.1596/978-1-4648-1590-4. Retrieved 31 August 2026, from https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/nonrenewable-natural-capital-per-capita-total-real-chained-2019-us/kyrgyz-republic/mexico/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/nonrenewable-natural-capital-per-capita-total-real-chained-2019-us/kyrgyz-republic/mexico/">Kyrgyzstan vs Mexico: Nonrenewable natural capital per capita, total</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Nonrenewable natural capital per capita, total (real chained 2019 US$)
Unit
real chained 2019 US$
Source
World Bank. 2021. The Changing Wealth of Nations 2021: Managing Assets for the Future. Washington, DC: World Bank. doi:10.1596/978-1-4648-1590-4
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
151 places, 3,885 data points, 1995–2020
Last refreshed

Natural capital includes the valuation of renewable and nonrenewable natural capital. Renewable natural capital includes agricultural land (cropland and pastureland), forests (timber, and three ecosystem services: water, recretion and non-wood forest products), protected areas, mangroves and fisheries. Nonrenewable natural capital includes fossil fuel energy (oil, gas, hard and soft coal) and minerals (bauxite, copper, gold, iron ore, lead, nickel, phosphate, silver, tin, and zinc),Values are measured at market exchange rates in constant 2018 US dollars, using a country-specific GDP deflator.