Israel vs Serbia: Nonrenewable natural capital per capita, total

Israel
1,679 real chained 2019 US$
in 2020
Serbia
1,629 real chained 2019 US$
in 2020
Israel rank
47th
Serbia rank
49th

Nonrenewable natural capital per capita, total over time

  • Israel
  • Serbia
05001.0k1.5k2.0k199520072020

How they compare

Israel currently reports 1,679 real chained 2019 US$ against 1,629 real chained 2019 US$ in Serbia, a difference of 50 real chained 2019 US$.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 14 shared years of data; in 2007 it was Serbia ahead.

Israel ranks 47th and Serbia ranks 49th of 151 countries.

Across the 3 decades both report, Israel averaged higher in 1 and Serbia in 2.

Head to head by decade

Decade Israel Serbia Difference Ahead
2000s 567.62 real chained 2019 US$ 1,945 real chained 2019 US$ 1,377 real chained 2019 US$ Serbia
2010s 940.4 real chained 2019 US$ 1,744 real chained 2019 US$ 803.64 real chained 2019 US$ Serbia
2020s 1,679 real chained 2019 US$ 1,629 real chained 2019 US$ 50.82 real chained 2019 US$ Israel

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher nonrenewable natural capital per capita, total, Israel or Serbia?
Israel, at 1,679 real chained 2019 US$ against 1,629 real chained 2019 US$ in Serbia as of 2020.
What is the difference in nonrenewable natural capital per capita, total between Israel and Serbia?
50 real chained 2019 US$, with Israel ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Israel and Serbia?
14 years are reported by both, from 2007 to 2020.
How do Israel and Serbia rank globally for nonrenewable natural capital per capita, total?
Israel ranks 47th and Serbia ranks 49th of 151 countries.
Where does this data come from?
World Bank. 2021. The Changing Wealth of Nations 2021: Managing Assets for the Future. Washington, DC: World Bank. doi:10.1596/978-1-4648-1590-4, published as Nonrenewable natural capital per capita, total (real chained 2019 US$). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Israel vs Serbia: Nonrenewable natural capital per capita, total. Statizoid, drawing on World Bank. 2021. The Changing Wealth of Nations 2021: Managing Assets for the Future. Washington, DC: World Bank. doi:10.1596/978-1-4648-1590-4. Retrieved 28 August 2026, from https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/nonrenewable-natural-capital-per-capita-total-real-chained-2019-us/israel/serbia/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/nonrenewable-natural-capital-per-capita-total-real-chained-2019-us/israel/serbia/">Israel vs Serbia: Nonrenewable natural capital per capita, total</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Nonrenewable natural capital per capita, total (real chained 2019 US$)
Unit
real chained 2019 US$
Source
World Bank. 2021. The Changing Wealth of Nations 2021: Managing Assets for the Future. Washington, DC: World Bank. doi:10.1596/978-1-4648-1590-4
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
151 places, 3,885 data points, 1995–2020
Last refreshed

Natural capital includes the valuation of renewable and nonrenewable natural capital. Renewable natural capital includes agricultural land (cropland and pastureland), forests (timber, and three ecosystem services: water, recretion and non-wood forest products), protected areas, mangroves and fisheries. Nonrenewable natural capital includes fossil fuel energy (oil, gas, hard and soft coal) and minerals (bauxite, copper, gold, iron ore, lead, nickel, phosphate, silver, tin, and zinc),Values are measured at market exchange rates in constant 2018 US dollars, using a country-specific GDP deflator.