Israel vs Namibia: Nonrenewable natural capital per capita, total

Israel
1,679 real chained 2019 US$
in 2020
Namibia
1,712 real chained 2019 US$
in 2020
Israel rank
47th
Namibia rank
44th

Nonrenewable natural capital per capita, total over time

  • Israel
  • Namibia
02.0k4.0k6.0k199520072020

How they compare

Namibia currently reports 1,712 real chained 2019 US$ against 1,679 real chained 2019 US$ in Israel, a difference of 33 real chained 2019 US$.

Across all 26 years both countries report, Namibia has been ahead every year.

Israel ranks 47th and Namibia ranks 44th of 151 countries.

Namibia has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Israel Namibia Difference Ahead
1990s 18.95 real chained 2019 US$ 6,170 real chained 2019 US$ 6,152 real chained 2019 US$ Namibia
2000s 603.02 real chained 2019 US$ 4,635 real chained 2019 US$ 4,032 real chained 2019 US$ Namibia
2010s 940.4 real chained 2019 US$ 2,626 real chained 2019 US$ 1,685 real chained 2019 US$ Namibia
2020s 1,679 real chained 2019 US$ 1,712 real chained 2019 US$ 32.18 real chained 2019 US$ Namibia

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher nonrenewable natural capital per capita, total, Israel or Namibia?
Namibia, at 1,712 real chained 2019 US$ against 1,679 real chained 2019 US$ in Israel as of 2020.
What is the difference in nonrenewable natural capital per capita, total between Israel and Namibia?
33 real chained 2019 US$, with Namibia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Israel and Namibia?
26 years are reported by both, from 1995 to 2020.
How do Israel and Namibia rank globally for nonrenewable natural capital per capita, total?
Israel ranks 47th and Namibia ranks 44th of 151 countries.
Where does this data come from?
World Bank. 2021. The Changing Wealth of Nations 2021: Managing Assets for the Future. Washington, DC: World Bank. doi:10.1596/978-1-4648-1590-4, published as Nonrenewable natural capital per capita, total (real chained 2019 US$). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Israel vs Namibia: Nonrenewable natural capital per capita, total. Statizoid, drawing on World Bank. 2021. The Changing Wealth of Nations 2021: Managing Assets for the Future. Washington, DC: World Bank. doi:10.1596/978-1-4648-1590-4. Retrieved 17 August 2026, from https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/nonrenewable-natural-capital-per-capita-total-real-chained-2019-us/israel/namibia/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/nonrenewable-natural-capital-per-capita-total-real-chained-2019-us/israel/namibia/">Israel vs Namibia: Nonrenewable natural capital per capita, total</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Nonrenewable natural capital per capita, total (real chained 2019 US$)
Unit
real chained 2019 US$
Source
World Bank. 2021. The Changing Wealth of Nations 2021: Managing Assets for the Future. Washington, DC: World Bank. doi:10.1596/978-1-4648-1590-4
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
151 places, 3,885 data points, 1995–2020
Last refreshed

Natural capital includes the valuation of renewable and nonrenewable natural capital. Renewable natural capital includes agricultural land (cropland and pastureland), forests (timber, and three ecosystem services: water, recretion and non-wood forest products), protected areas, mangroves and fisheries. Nonrenewable natural capital includes fossil fuel energy (oil, gas, hard and soft coal) and minerals (bauxite, copper, gold, iron ore, lead, nickel, phosphate, silver, tin, and zinc),Values are measured at market exchange rates in constant 2018 US dollars, using a country-specific GDP deflator.