Guyana vs Kazakhstan: Nonrenewable natural capital per capita, total

Guyana
39,987 real chained 2019 US$
in 2020
Kazakhstan
27,570 real chained 2019 US$
in 2020
Guyana rank
6th
Kazakhstan rank
8th

Nonrenewable natural capital per capita, total over time

  • Guyana
  • Kazakhstan
020.0k40.0k60.0k199520072020

How they compare

Guyana currently reports 39,987 real chained 2019 US$ against 27,570 real chained 2019 US$ in Kazakhstan, a difference of 12,417 real chained 2019 US$.

That makes Guyana's figure about 1.5 times Kazakhstan's.

Across all 26 years both countries report, Guyana has been ahead every year.

Guyana ranks 6th and Kazakhstan ranks 8th of 151 countries.

Guyana has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Guyana Kazakhstan Difference Ahead
1990s 64,133 real chained 2019 US$ 10,126 real chained 2019 US$ 54,006 real chained 2019 US$ Guyana
2000s 58,411 real chained 2019 US$ 20,132 real chained 2019 US$ 38,279 real chained 2019 US$ Guyana
2010s 50,115 real chained 2019 US$ 27,414 real chained 2019 US$ 22,701 real chained 2019 US$ Guyana
2020s 39,987 real chained 2019 US$ 27,570 real chained 2019 US$ 12,417 real chained 2019 US$ Guyana

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher nonrenewable natural capital per capita, total, Guyana or Kazakhstan?
Guyana, at 39,987 real chained 2019 US$ against 27,570 real chained 2019 US$ in Kazakhstan as of 2020.
What is the difference in nonrenewable natural capital per capita, total between Guyana and Kazakhstan?
12,417 real chained 2019 US$, with Guyana ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Guyana and Kazakhstan?
26 years are reported by both, from 1995 to 2020.
How do Guyana and Kazakhstan rank globally for nonrenewable natural capital per capita, total?
Guyana ranks 6th and Kazakhstan ranks 8th of 151 countries.
Where does this data come from?
World Bank. 2021. The Changing Wealth of Nations 2021: Managing Assets for the Future. Washington, DC: World Bank. doi:10.1596/978-1-4648-1590-4, published as Nonrenewable natural capital per capita, total (real chained 2019 US$). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Guyana vs Kazakhstan: Nonrenewable natural capital per capita, total. Statizoid, drawing on World Bank. 2021. The Changing Wealth of Nations 2021: Managing Assets for the Future. Washington, DC: World Bank. doi:10.1596/978-1-4648-1590-4. Retrieved 22 August 2026, from https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/nonrenewable-natural-capital-per-capita-total-real-chained-2019-us/guyana/kazakhstan/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/nonrenewable-natural-capital-per-capita-total-real-chained-2019-us/guyana/kazakhstan/">Guyana vs Kazakhstan: Nonrenewable natural capital per capita, total</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Nonrenewable natural capital per capita, total (real chained 2019 US$)
Unit
real chained 2019 US$
Source
World Bank. 2021. The Changing Wealth of Nations 2021: Managing Assets for the Future. Washington, DC: World Bank. doi:10.1596/978-1-4648-1590-4
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
151 places, 3,885 data points, 1995–2020
Last refreshed

Natural capital includes the valuation of renewable and nonrenewable natural capital. Renewable natural capital includes agricultural land (cropland and pastureland), forests (timber, and three ecosystem services: water, recretion and non-wood forest products), protected areas, mangroves and fisheries. Nonrenewable natural capital includes fossil fuel energy (oil, gas, hard and soft coal) and minerals (bauxite, copper, gold, iron ore, lead, nickel, phosphate, silver, tin, and zinc),Values are measured at market exchange rates in constant 2018 US dollars, using a country-specific GDP deflator.