Chad vs Montenegro: Nonrenewable natural capital per capita, total

Chad
1,201 real chained 2019 US$
in 2020
Montenegro
1,186 real chained 2019 US$
in 2020
Chad rank
54th
Montenegro rank
55th

Nonrenewable natural capital per capita, total over time

  • Chad
  • Montenegro
05001.0k1.5k2.0k199520072020

How they compare

Chad currently reports 1,201 real chained 2019 US$ against 1,186 real chained 2019 US$ in Montenegro, a difference of 15 real chained 2019 US$.

Across all 14 years both countries report, Chad has been ahead every year.

Chad ranks 54th and Montenegro ranks 55th of 151 countries.

Chad has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Chad Montenegro Difference Ahead
2000s 1,854 real chained 2019 US$ 1,396 real chained 2019 US$ 458.4 real chained 2019 US$ Chad
2010s 1,474 real chained 2019 US$ 1,304 real chained 2019 US$ 169.7 real chained 2019 US$ Chad
2020s 1,201 real chained 2019 US$ 1,186 real chained 2019 US$ 14.17 real chained 2019 US$ Chad

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher nonrenewable natural capital per capita, total, Chad or Montenegro?
Chad, at 1,201 real chained 2019 US$ against 1,186 real chained 2019 US$ in Montenegro as of 2020.
What is the difference in nonrenewable natural capital per capita, total between Chad and Montenegro?
15 real chained 2019 US$, with Chad ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Chad and Montenegro?
14 years are reported by both, from 2007 to 2020.
How do Chad and Montenegro rank globally for nonrenewable natural capital per capita, total?
Chad ranks 54th and Montenegro ranks 55th of 151 countries.
Where does this data come from?
World Bank. 2021. The Changing Wealth of Nations 2021: Managing Assets for the Future. Washington, DC: World Bank. doi:10.1596/978-1-4648-1590-4, published as Nonrenewable natural capital per capita, total (real chained 2019 US$). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Chad vs Montenegro: Nonrenewable natural capital per capita, total. Statizoid, drawing on World Bank. 2021. The Changing Wealth of Nations 2021: Managing Assets for the Future. Washington, DC: World Bank. doi:10.1596/978-1-4648-1590-4. Retrieved 22 August 2026, from https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/nonrenewable-natural-capital-per-capita-total-real-chained-2019-us/chad/montenegro/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/nonrenewable-natural-capital-per-capita-total-real-chained-2019-us/chad/montenegro/">Chad vs Montenegro: Nonrenewable natural capital per capita, total</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Nonrenewable natural capital per capita, total (real chained 2019 US$)
Unit
real chained 2019 US$
Source
World Bank. 2021. The Changing Wealth of Nations 2021: Managing Assets for the Future. Washington, DC: World Bank. doi:10.1596/978-1-4648-1590-4
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
151 places, 3,885 data points, 1995–2020
Last refreshed

Natural capital includes the valuation of renewable and nonrenewable natural capital. Renewable natural capital includes agricultural land (cropland and pastureland), forests (timber, and three ecosystem services: water, recretion and non-wood forest products), protected areas, mangroves and fisheries. Nonrenewable natural capital includes fossil fuel energy (oil, gas, hard and soft coal) and minerals (bauxite, copper, gold, iron ore, lead, nickel, phosphate, silver, tin, and zinc),Values are measured at market exchange rates in constant 2018 US dollars, using a country-specific GDP deflator.