Bosnia and Herzegovina vs Guinea: Nonrenewable natural capital per capita, total

Bosnia and Herzegovina
1,691 real chained 2019 US$
in 2020
Guinea
1,694 real chained 2019 US$
in 2020
Bosnia and Herzegovina rank
46th
Guinea rank
45th

Nonrenewable natural capital per capita, total over time

  • Bosnia and Herzegovina
  • Guinea
1.0k2.0k3.0k4.0k199520072020

How they compare

Guinea currently reports 1,694 real chained 2019 US$ against 1,691 real chained 2019 US$ in Bosnia and Herzegovina, a difference of 3 real chained 2019 US$.

The two have swapped places 2 times across 26 shared years of data; in 1995 it was Guinea ahead.

Bosnia and Herzegovina ranks 46th and Guinea ranks 45th of 151 countries.

Guinea has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Bosnia and Herzegovina Guinea Difference Ahead
1990s 1,817 real chained 2019 US$ 3,298 real chained 2019 US$ 1,481 real chained 2019 US$ Guinea
2000s 1,733 real chained 2019 US$ 3,111 real chained 2019 US$ 1,378 real chained 2019 US$ Guinea
2010s 1,725 real chained 2019 US$ 1,979 real chained 2019 US$ 253.13 real chained 2019 US$ Guinea
2020s 1,691 real chained 2019 US$ 1,694 real chained 2019 US$ 3.31 real chained 2019 US$ Guinea

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher nonrenewable natural capital per capita, total, Bosnia and Herzegovina or Guinea?
Guinea, at 1,694 real chained 2019 US$ against 1,691 real chained 2019 US$ in Bosnia and Herzegovina as of 2020.
What is the difference in nonrenewable natural capital per capita, total between Bosnia and Herzegovina and Guinea?
3 real chained 2019 US$, with Guinea ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Bosnia and Herzegovina and Guinea?
26 years are reported by both, from 1995 to 2020.
How do Bosnia and Herzegovina and Guinea rank globally for nonrenewable natural capital per capita, total?
Bosnia and Herzegovina ranks 46th and Guinea ranks 45th of 151 countries.
Where does this data come from?
World Bank. 2021. The Changing Wealth of Nations 2021: Managing Assets for the Future. Washington, DC: World Bank. doi:10.1596/978-1-4648-1590-4, published as Nonrenewable natural capital per capita, total (real chained 2019 US$). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Bosnia and Herzegovina vs Guinea: Nonrenewable natural capital per capita, total. Statizoid, drawing on World Bank. 2021. The Changing Wealth of Nations 2021: Managing Assets for the Future. Washington, DC: World Bank. doi:10.1596/978-1-4648-1590-4. Retrieved 10 September 2026, from https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/nonrenewable-natural-capital-per-capita-total-real-chained-2019-us/bosnia-and-herzegovina/guinea/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/nonrenewable-natural-capital-per-capita-total-real-chained-2019-us/bosnia-and-herzegovina/guinea/">Bosnia and Herzegovina vs Guinea: Nonrenewable natural capital per capita, total</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Nonrenewable natural capital per capita, total (real chained 2019 US$)
Unit
real chained 2019 US$
Source
World Bank. 2021. The Changing Wealth of Nations 2021: Managing Assets for the Future. Washington, DC: World Bank. doi:10.1596/978-1-4648-1590-4
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
151 places, 3,885 data points, 1995–2020
Last refreshed

Natural capital includes the valuation of renewable and nonrenewable natural capital. Renewable natural capital includes agricultural land (cropland and pastureland), forests (timber, and three ecosystem services: water, recretion and non-wood forest products), protected areas, mangroves and fisheries. Nonrenewable natural capital includes fossil fuel energy (oil, gas, hard and soft coal) and minerals (bauxite, copper, gold, iron ore, lead, nickel, phosphate, silver, tin, and zinc),Values are measured at market exchange rates in constant 2018 US dollars, using a country-specific GDP deflator.