Belarus vs Tunisia: Nonrenewable natural capital per capita, total

Belarus
364.3 real chained 2019 US$
in 2020
Tunisia
366.95 real chained 2019 US$
in 2020
Belarus rank
95th
Tunisia rank
94th

Nonrenewable natural capital per capita, total over time

  • Belarus
  • Tunisia
0200400600199520072020

How they compare

Tunisia currently reports 366.95 real chained 2019 US$ against 364.3 real chained 2019 US$ in Belarus, a difference of 2.65 real chained 2019 US$.

Across all 26 years both countries report, Tunisia has been ahead every year.

Belarus ranks 95th and Tunisia ranks 94th of 151 countries.

Tunisia has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Belarus Tunisia Difference Ahead
1990s 337.87 real chained 2019 US$ 428.84 real chained 2019 US$ 90.97 real chained 2019 US$ Tunisia
2000s 351.78 real chained 2019 US$ 511.71 real chained 2019 US$ 159.93 real chained 2019 US$ Tunisia
2010s 361.47 real chained 2019 US$ 399.71 real chained 2019 US$ 38.24 real chained 2019 US$ Tunisia
2020s 364.3 real chained 2019 US$ 366.95 real chained 2019 US$ 2.65 real chained 2019 US$ Tunisia

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher nonrenewable natural capital per capita, total, Belarus or Tunisia?
Tunisia, at 366.95 real chained 2019 US$ against 364.3 real chained 2019 US$ in Belarus as of 2020.
What is the difference in nonrenewable natural capital per capita, total between Belarus and Tunisia?
2.65 real chained 2019 US$, with Tunisia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Belarus and Tunisia?
26 years are reported by both, from 1995 to 2020.
How do Belarus and Tunisia rank globally for nonrenewable natural capital per capita, total?
Belarus ranks 95th and Tunisia ranks 94th of 151 countries.
Where does this data come from?
World Bank. 2021. The Changing Wealth of Nations 2021: Managing Assets for the Future. Washington, DC: World Bank. doi:10.1596/978-1-4648-1590-4, published as Nonrenewable natural capital per capita, total (real chained 2019 US$). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Belarus vs Tunisia: Nonrenewable natural capital per capita, total. Statizoid, drawing on World Bank. 2021. The Changing Wealth of Nations 2021: Managing Assets for the Future. Washington, DC: World Bank. doi:10.1596/978-1-4648-1590-4. Retrieved 21 August 2026, from https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/nonrenewable-natural-capital-per-capita-total-real-chained-2019-us/belarus/tunisia/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/nonrenewable-natural-capital-per-capita-total-real-chained-2019-us/belarus/tunisia/">Belarus vs Tunisia: Nonrenewable natural capital per capita, total</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Nonrenewable natural capital per capita, total (real chained 2019 US$)
Unit
real chained 2019 US$
Source
World Bank. 2021. The Changing Wealth of Nations 2021: Managing Assets for the Future. Washington, DC: World Bank. doi:10.1596/978-1-4648-1590-4
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
151 places, 3,885 data points, 1995–2020
Last refreshed

Natural capital includes the valuation of renewable and nonrenewable natural capital. Renewable natural capital includes agricultural land (cropland and pastureland), forests (timber, and three ecosystem services: water, recretion and non-wood forest products), protected areas, mangroves and fisheries. Nonrenewable natural capital includes fossil fuel energy (oil, gas, hard and soft coal) and minerals (bauxite, copper, gold, iron ore, lead, nickel, phosphate, silver, tin, and zinc),Values are measured at market exchange rates in constant 2018 US dollars, using a country-specific GDP deflator.