Zambia vs Zimbabwe: Nonrenewable natural capital per capita, total
Zambia
1,103 current US$
in 2020
Zimbabwe
1,143 current US$
in 2020
Zambia rank
54th
Zimbabwe rank
53rd
Nonrenewable natural capital per capita, total over time
- Zambia
- Zimbabwe
How they compare
Zimbabwe currently reports 1,143 current US$ against 1,103 current US$ in Zambia, a difference of 40 current US$.
The two have swapped places 4 times across 26 shared years of data; in 1995 it was Zimbabwe ahead.
Zambia ranks 54th and Zimbabwe ranks 53rd of 150 countries.
Across the 4 decades both report, Zambia averaged higher in 2 and Zimbabwe in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Zambia | Zimbabwe | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 254.55 current US$ | 353.5 current US$ | 98.94 current US$ | Zimbabwe |
| 2000s | 1,339 current US$ | 324.54 current US$ | 1,014 current US$ | Zambia |
| 2010s | 2,066 current US$ | 531.42 current US$ | 1,534 current US$ | Zambia |
| 2020s | 1,103 current US$ | 1,143 current US$ | 39.49 current US$ | Zimbabwe |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher nonrenewable natural capital per capita, total, Zambia or Zimbabwe?
- Zimbabwe, at 1,143 current US$ against 1,103 current US$ in Zambia as of 2020.
- What is the difference in nonrenewable natural capital per capita, total between Zambia and Zimbabwe?
- 40 current US$, with Zimbabwe ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Zambia and Zimbabwe?
- 26 years are reported by both, from 1995 to 2020.
- How do Zambia and Zimbabwe rank globally for nonrenewable natural capital per capita, total?
- Zambia ranks 54th and Zimbabwe ranks 53rd of 150 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Nonrenewable natural capital per capita, total (current US$). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.