Russia vs Suriname: Nonrenewable natural capital per capita, total
Russia
19,300 current US$
in 2020
Suriname
20,792 current US$
in 2020
Russia rank
10th
Suriname rank
8th
Nonrenewable natural capital per capita, total over time
- Russia
- Suriname
How they compare
Suriname currently reports 20,792 current US$ against 19,300 current US$ in Russia, a difference of 1,492 current US$.
That makes Suriname's figure about 1.1 times Russia's.
The two have swapped places 11 times across 26 shared years of data; in 1995 it was Russia ahead.
Russia ranks 10th and Suriname ranks 8th of 151 countries.
Across the 4 decades both report, Russia averaged higher in 3 and Suriname in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Russia | Suriname | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 4,657 current US$ | 1,335 current US$ | 3,322 current US$ | Russia |
| 2000s | 12,644 current US$ | 6,711 current US$ | 5,934 current US$ | Russia |
| 2010s | 18,948 current US$ | 18,607 current US$ | 340.99 current US$ | Russia |
| 2020s | 19,300 current US$ | 20,792 current US$ | 1,492 current US$ | Suriname |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher nonrenewable natural capital per capita, total, Russia or Suriname?
- Suriname, at 20,792 current US$ against 19,300 current US$ in Russia as of 2020.
- What is the difference in nonrenewable natural capital per capita, total between Russia and Suriname?
- 1,492 current US$, with Suriname ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Russia and Suriname?
- 26 years are reported by both, from 1995 to 2020.
- How do Russia and Suriname rank globally for nonrenewable natural capital per capita, total?
- Russia ranks 10th and Suriname ranks 8th of 151 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Nonrenewable natural capital per capita, total (current US$). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.