Laos vs Zimbabwe: Nonrenewable natural capital per capita, total (current US$) (capita)
Laos
1,244 current US$
in 2020
Zimbabwe
1,143 current US$
in 2020
Laos rank
50th
Zimbabwe rank
53rd
Nonrenewable natural capital per capita, total (current US$) (capita) over time
- Laos
- Zimbabwe
How they compare
Laos currently reports 1,244 current US$ against 1,143 current US$ in Zimbabwe, a difference of 101 current US$.
That makes Laos's figure about 1.1 times Zimbabwe's.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 26 shared years of data; in 1995 it was Zimbabwe ahead.
Laos ranks 50th and Zimbabwe ranks 53rd of 151 countries.
Across the 4 decades both report, Laos averaged higher in 3 and Zimbabwe in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Laos | Zimbabwe | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 0.4166 current US$ | 353.5 current US$ | 353.08 current US$ | Zimbabwe |
| 2000s | 545.78 current US$ | 324.54 current US$ | 221.24 current US$ | Laos |
| 2010s | 1,626 current US$ | 531.42 current US$ | 1,094 current US$ | Laos |
| 2020s | 1,244 current US$ | 1,143 current US$ | 101.18 current US$ | Laos |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher nonrenewable natural capital per capita, total, Laos or Zimbabwe?
- Laos, at 1,244 current US$ against 1,143 current US$ in Zimbabwe as of 2020.
- What is the difference in nonrenewable natural capital per capita, total between Laos and Zimbabwe?
- 101 current US$, with Laos ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Laos and Zimbabwe?
- 26 years are reported by both, from 1995 to 2020.
- How do Laos and Zimbabwe rank globally for nonrenewable natural capital per capita, total?
- Laos ranks 50th and Zimbabwe ranks 53rd of 151 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Nonrenewable natural capital per capita, total (current US$). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.