Guinea vs Serbia: Nonrenewable natural capital per capita, total
Guinea
1,378 current US$
in 2020
Serbia
1,484 current US$
in 2020
Guinea rank
47th
Serbia rank
45th
Nonrenewable natural capital per capita, total over time
- Guinea
- Serbia
How they compare
Serbia currently reports 1,484 current US$ against 1,378 current US$ in Guinea, a difference of 106 current US$.
That makes Serbia's figure about 1.1 times Guinea's.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 14 shared years of data; in 2007 it was Serbia ahead.
Guinea ranks 47th and Serbia ranks 45th of 150 countries.
Serbia has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Guinea | Serbia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 666.36 current US$ | 2,725 current US$ | 2,059 current US$ | Serbia |
| 2010s | 693.73 current US$ | 2,524 current US$ | 1,830 current US$ | Serbia |
| 2020s | 1,378 current US$ | 1,484 current US$ | 106 current US$ | Serbia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher nonrenewable natural capital per capita, total, Guinea or Serbia?
- Serbia, at 1,484 current US$ against 1,378 current US$ in Guinea as of 2020.
- What is the difference in nonrenewable natural capital per capita, total between Guinea and Serbia?
- 106 current US$, with Serbia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Guinea and Serbia?
- 14 years are reported by both, from 2007 to 2020.
- How do Guinea and Serbia rank globally for nonrenewable natural capital per capita, total?
- Guinea ranks 47th and Serbia ranks 45th of 150 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Nonrenewable natural capital per capita, total (current US$). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.