Georgia vs Zimbabwe: Nonrenewable natural capital per capita, total
Georgia
1,080 current US$
in 2020
Zimbabwe
1,143 current US$
in 2020
Georgia rank
55th
Zimbabwe rank
53rd
Nonrenewable natural capital per capita, total over time
- Georgia
- Zimbabwe
How they compare
Zimbabwe currently reports 1,143 current US$ against 1,080 current US$ in Georgia, a difference of 63 current US$.
That makes Zimbabwe's figure about 1.1 times Georgia's.
The two have swapped places 6 times across 26 shared years of data; in 1995 it was Zimbabwe ahead.
Georgia ranks 55th and Zimbabwe ranks 53rd of 150 countries.
Zimbabwe has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Georgia | Zimbabwe | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 37.95 current US$ | 353.5 current US$ | 315.55 current US$ | Zimbabwe |
| 2000s | 135.46 current US$ | 324.54 current US$ | 189.08 current US$ | Zimbabwe |
| 2010s | 502.12 current US$ | 531.42 current US$ | 29.3 current US$ | Zimbabwe |
| 2020s | 1,080 current US$ | 1,143 current US$ | 62.87 current US$ | Zimbabwe |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher nonrenewable natural capital per capita, total, Georgia or Zimbabwe?
- Zimbabwe, at 1,143 current US$ against 1,080 current US$ in Georgia as of 2020.
- What is the difference in nonrenewable natural capital per capita, total between Georgia and Zimbabwe?
- 63 current US$, with Zimbabwe ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Georgia and Zimbabwe?
- 26 years are reported by both, from 1995 to 2020.
- How do Georgia and Zimbabwe rank globally for nonrenewable natural capital per capita, total?
- Georgia ranks 55th and Zimbabwe ranks 53rd of 150 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Nonrenewable natural capital per capita, total (current US$). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.