Georgia vs Zambia: Nonrenewable natural capital per capita, total
Georgia
1,080 current US$
in 2020
Zambia
1,103 current US$
in 2020
Georgia rank
55th
Zambia rank
54th
Nonrenewable natural capital per capita, total over time
- Georgia
- Zambia
How they compare
Zambia currently reports 1,103 current US$ against 1,080 current US$ in Georgia, a difference of 23 current US$.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 26 shared years of data; in 1995 it was Zambia ahead.
Georgia ranks 55th and Zambia ranks 54th of 150 countries.
Zambia has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Georgia | Zambia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 37.95 current US$ | 254.55 current US$ | 216.61 current US$ | Zambia |
| 2000s | 135.46 current US$ | 1,339 current US$ | 1,203 current US$ | Zambia |
| 2010s | 502.12 current US$ | 2,066 current US$ | 1,564 current US$ | Zambia |
| 2020s | 1,080 current US$ | 1,103 current US$ | 23.38 current US$ | Zambia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher nonrenewable natural capital per capita, total, Georgia or Zambia?
- Zambia, at 1,103 current US$ against 1,080 current US$ in Georgia as of 2020.
- What is the difference in nonrenewable natural capital per capita, total between Georgia and Zambia?
- 23 current US$, with Zambia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Georgia and Zambia?
- 26 years are reported by both, from 1995 to 2020.
- How do Georgia and Zambia rank globally for nonrenewable natural capital per capita, total?
- Georgia ranks 55th and Zambia ranks 54th of 150 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Nonrenewable natural capital per capita, total (current US$). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.