Ecuador vs Serbia: Nonrenewable natural capital per capita, total
Ecuador
1,570 current US$
in 2020
Serbia
1,484 current US$
in 2020
Ecuador rank
43rd
Serbia rank
45th
Nonrenewable natural capital per capita, total over time
- Ecuador
- Serbia
How they compare
Ecuador currently reports 1,570 current US$ against 1,484 current US$ in Serbia, a difference of 86 current US$.
That makes Ecuador's figure about 1.1 times Serbia's.
Across all 14 years both countries report, Ecuador has been ahead every year.
Ecuador ranks 43rd and Serbia ranks 45th of 150 countries.
Ecuador has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Ecuador | Serbia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 7,560 current US$ | 2,725 current US$ | 4,834 current US$ | Ecuador |
| 2010s | 5,283 current US$ | 2,524 current US$ | 2,759 current US$ | Ecuador |
| 2020s | 1,570 current US$ | 1,484 current US$ | 85.92 current US$ | Ecuador |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher nonrenewable natural capital per capita, total, Ecuador or Serbia?
- Ecuador, at 1,570 current US$ against 1,484 current US$ in Serbia as of 2020.
- What is the difference in nonrenewable natural capital per capita, total between Ecuador and Serbia?
- 86 current US$, with Ecuador ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Ecuador and Serbia?
- 14 years are reported by both, from 2007 to 2020.
- How do Ecuador and Serbia rank globally for nonrenewable natural capital per capita, total?
- Ecuador ranks 43rd and Serbia ranks 45th of 150 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Nonrenewable natural capital per capita, total (current US$). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.