Congo vs Saudi Arabia: Nonrenewable natural capital per capita, total
Congo
4,948 current US$
in 2020
Saudi Arabia
3,937 current US$
in 2020
Congo rank
19th
Saudi Arabia rank
22nd
Nonrenewable natural capital per capita, total over time
- Congo
- Saudi Arabia
How they compare
Congo currently reports 4,948 current US$ against 3,937 current US$ in Saudi Arabia, a difference of 1,011 current US$.
That makes Congo's figure about 1.3 times Saudi Arabia's.
Across all 26 years both countries report, Congo has been ahead every year.
Congo ranks 19th and Saudi Arabia ranks 22nd of 150 countries.
Congo has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Congo | Saudi Arabia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 3,948 current US$ | 1,224 current US$ | 2,724 current US$ | Congo |
| 2000s | 11,366 current US$ | 1,133 current US$ | 10,233 current US$ | Congo |
| 2010s | 15,157 current US$ | 525.14 current US$ | 14,631 current US$ | Congo |
| 2020s | 4,948 current US$ | 3,937 current US$ | 1,011 current US$ | Congo |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher nonrenewable natural capital per capita, total, Congo or Saudi Arabia?
- Congo, at 4,948 current US$ against 3,937 current US$ in Saudi Arabia as of 2020.
- What is the difference in nonrenewable natural capital per capita, total between Congo and Saudi Arabia?
- 1,011 current US$, with Congo ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Congo and Saudi Arabia?
- 26 years are reported by both, from 1995 to 2020.
- How do Congo and Saudi Arabia rank globally for nonrenewable natural capital per capita, total?
- Congo ranks 19th and Saudi Arabia ranks 22nd of 150 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Nonrenewable natural capital per capita, total (current US$). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.