Congo vs Peru: Nonrenewable natural capital per capita, total
Congo
4,948 current US$
in 2020
Peru
6,132 current US$
in 2020
Congo rank
19th
Peru rank
17th
Nonrenewable natural capital per capita, total over time
- Congo
- Peru
How they compare
Peru currently reports 6,132 current US$ against 4,948 current US$ in Congo, a difference of 1,184 current US$.
That makes Peru's figure about 1.2 times Congo's.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 26 shared years of data; in 1995 it was Congo ahead.
Congo ranks 19th and Peru ranks 17th of 150 countries.
Across the 4 decades both report, Congo averaged higher in 3 and Peru in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Congo | Peru | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 3,948 current US$ | 619.41 current US$ | 3,329 current US$ | Congo |
| 2000s | 11,366 current US$ | 3,704 current US$ | 7,662 current US$ | Congo |
| 2010s | 15,157 current US$ | 6,813 current US$ | 8,344 current US$ | Congo |
| 2020s | 4,948 current US$ | 6,132 current US$ | 1,185 current US$ | Peru |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher nonrenewable natural capital per capita, total, Congo or Peru?
- Peru, at 6,132 current US$ against 4,948 current US$ in Congo as of 2020.
- What is the difference in nonrenewable natural capital per capita, total between Congo and Peru?
- 1,184 current US$, with Peru ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Congo and Peru?
- 26 years are reported by both, from 1995 to 2020.
- How do Congo and Peru rank globally for nonrenewable natural capital per capita, total?
- Congo ranks 19th and Peru ranks 17th of 150 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Nonrenewable natural capital per capita, total (current US$). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.