Brazil vs South Africa: Nonrenewable natural capital per capita, total
Brazil
3,574 current US$
in 2020
South Africa
3,421 current US$
in 2020
Brazil rank
27th
South Africa rank
28th
Nonrenewable natural capital per capita, total over time
- Brazil
- South Africa
How they compare
Brazil currently reports 3,574 current US$ against 3,421 current US$ in South Africa, a difference of 153 current US$.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 26 shared years of data; in 1995 it was South Africa ahead.
Brazil ranks 27th and South Africa ranks 28th of 151 countries.
Across the 4 decades both report, Brazil averaged higher in 1 and South Africa in 3.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Brazil | South Africa | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 208.19 current US$ | 865.79 current US$ | 657.59 current US$ | South Africa |
| 2000s | 2,494 current US$ | 4,000 current US$ | 1,506 current US$ | South Africa |
| 2010s | 2,863 current US$ | 5,077 current US$ | 2,213 current US$ | South Africa |
| 2020s | 3,574 current US$ | 3,421 current US$ | 152.81 current US$ | Brazil |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher nonrenewable natural capital per capita, total, Brazil or South Africa?
- Brazil, at 3,574 current US$ against 3,421 current US$ in South Africa as of 2020.
- What is the difference in nonrenewable natural capital per capita, total between Brazil and South Africa?
- 153 current US$, with Brazil ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Brazil and South Africa?
- 26 years are reported by both, from 1995 to 2020.
- How do Brazil and South Africa rank globally for nonrenewable natural capital per capita, total?
- Brazil ranks 27th and South Africa ranks 28th of 151 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Nonrenewable natural capital per capita, total (current US$). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.