Bosnia and Herzegovina vs Serbia: Nonrenewable natural capital per capita, total
Bosnia and Herzegovina
1,473 current US$
in 2020
Serbia
1,484 current US$
in 2020
Bosnia and Herzegovina rank
46th
Serbia rank
45th
Nonrenewable natural capital per capita, total over time
- Bosnia and Herzegovina
- Serbia
How they compare
Serbia currently reports 1,484 current US$ against 1,473 current US$ in Bosnia and Herzegovina, a difference of 11 current US$.
The two have swapped places 4 times across 14 shared years of data; in 2007 it was Serbia ahead.
Bosnia and Herzegovina ranks 46th and Serbia ranks 45th of 151 countries.
Serbia has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Bosnia and Herzegovina | Serbia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 2,451 current US$ | 2,725 current US$ | 274.14 current US$ | Serbia |
| 2010s | 2,104 current US$ | 2,524 current US$ | 420.27 current US$ | Serbia |
| 2020s | 1,473 current US$ | 1,484 current US$ | 10.93 current US$ | Serbia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher nonrenewable natural capital per capita, total, Bosnia and Herzegovina or Serbia?
- Serbia, at 1,484 current US$ against 1,473 current US$ in Bosnia and Herzegovina as of 2020.
- What is the difference in nonrenewable natural capital per capita, total between Bosnia and Herzegovina and Serbia?
- 11 current US$, with Serbia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Bosnia and Herzegovina and Serbia?
- 14 years are reported by both, from 2007 to 2020.
- How do Bosnia and Herzegovina and Serbia rank globally for nonrenewable natural capital per capita, total?
- Bosnia and Herzegovina ranks 46th and Serbia ranks 45th of 151 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Nonrenewable natural capital per capita, total (current US$). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.