Belarus vs Nicaragua: Nonrenewable natural capital per capita, total
Belarus
661.39 current US$
in 2020
Nicaragua
744.66 current US$
in 2020
Belarus rank
67th
Nicaragua rank
64th
Nonrenewable natural capital per capita, total over time
- Belarus
- Nicaragua
How they compare
Nicaragua currently reports 744.66 current US$ against 661.39 current US$ in Belarus, a difference of 83.27 current US$.
That makes Nicaragua's figure about 1.1 times Belarus's.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 26 shared years of data; in 1995 it was Belarus ahead.
Belarus ranks 67th and Nicaragua ranks 64th of 150 countries.
Across the 4 decades both report, Belarus averaged higher in 3 and Nicaragua in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Belarus | Nicaragua | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 293.01 current US$ | 5.51 current US$ | 287.5 current US$ | Belarus |
| 2000s | 707.87 current US$ | 29.14 current US$ | 678.74 current US$ | Belarus |
| 2010s | 1,089 current US$ | 240.09 current US$ | 848.49 current US$ | Belarus |
| 2020s | 661.39 current US$ | 744.66 current US$ | 83.27 current US$ | Nicaragua |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher nonrenewable natural capital per capita, total, Belarus or Nicaragua?
- Nicaragua, at 744.66 current US$ against 661.39 current US$ in Belarus as of 2020.
- What is the difference in nonrenewable natural capital per capita, total between Belarus and Nicaragua?
- 83.27 current US$, with Nicaragua ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Belarus and Nicaragua?
- 26 years are reported by both, from 1995 to 2020.
- How do Belarus and Nicaragua rank globally for nonrenewable natural capital per capita, total?
- Belarus ranks 67th and Nicaragua ranks 64th of 150 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Nonrenewable natural capital per capita, total (current US$). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.