Niger vs Serbia: Nonrenewable natural capital per capita, oil

Niger
127.38 real chained 2019 US$
in 2020
Serbia
156.91 real chained 2019 US$
in 2020
Niger rank
46th
Serbia rank
43rd

Nonrenewable natural capital per capita, oil over time

  • Niger
  • Serbia
0100200300199520072020

How they compare

Serbia currently reports 156.91 real chained 2019 US$ against 127.38 real chained 2019 US$ in Niger, a difference of 29.53 real chained 2019 US$.

That makes Serbia's figure about 1.2 times Niger's.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 14 shared years of data; in 2007 it was Niger ahead.

Niger ranks 46th and Serbia ranks 43rd of 145 countries.

Across the 3 decades both report, Niger averaged higher in 2 and Serbia in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Niger Serbia Difference Ahead
2000s 211.52 real chained 2019 US$ 147.27 real chained 2019 US$ 64.25 real chained 2019 US$ Niger
2010s 160.64 real chained 2019 US$ 152.25 real chained 2019 US$ 8.4 real chained 2019 US$ Niger
2020s 127.38 real chained 2019 US$ 156.91 real chained 2019 US$ 29.54 real chained 2019 US$ Serbia

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher nonrenewable natural capital per capita, oil, Niger or Serbia?
Serbia, at 156.91 real chained 2019 US$ against 127.38 real chained 2019 US$ in Niger as of 2020.
What is the difference in nonrenewable natural capital per capita, oil between Niger and Serbia?
29.53 real chained 2019 US$, with Serbia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Niger and Serbia?
14 years are reported by both, from 2007 to 2020.
How do Niger and Serbia rank globally for nonrenewable natural capital per capita, oil?
Niger ranks 46th and Serbia ranks 43rd of 145 countries.
Where does this data come from?
World Bank. 2021. The Changing Wealth of Nations 2021: Managing Assets for the Future. Washington, DC: World Bank. doi:10.1596/978-1-4648-1590-4, published as Nonrenewable natural capital per capita, oil (real chained 2019 US$). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Niger vs Serbia: Nonrenewable natural capital per capita, oil. Statizoid, drawing on World Bank. 2021. The Changing Wealth of Nations 2021: Managing Assets for the Future. Washington, DC: World Bank. doi:10.1596/978-1-4648-1590-4. Retrieved 29 August 2026, from https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/nonrenewable-natural-capital-per-capita-oil-real-chained-2019-us/niger/serbia/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/nonrenewable-natural-capital-per-capita-oil-real-chained-2019-us/niger/serbia/">Niger vs Serbia: Nonrenewable natural capital per capita, oil</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Nonrenewable natural capital per capita, oil (real chained 2019 US$)
Unit
real chained 2019 US$
Source
World Bank. 2021. The Changing Wealth of Nations 2021: Managing Assets for the Future. Washington, DC: World Bank. doi:10.1596/978-1-4648-1590-4
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
145 places, 3,729 data points, 1995–2020
Last refreshed

Natural capital includes the valuation of renewable and nonrenewable natural capital. Renewable natural capital includes agricultural land (cropland and pastureland), forests (timber, and three ecosystem services: water, recretion and non-wood forest products), protected areas, mangroves and fisheries. Nonrenewable natural capital includes fossil fuel energy (oil, gas, hard and soft coal) and minerals (bauxite, copper, gold, iron ore, lead, nickel, phosphate, silver, tin, and zinc),Values are measured at market exchange rates in constant 2018 US dollars, using a country-specific GDP deflator.