Malaysia vs Suriname: Nonrenewable natural capital per capita, oil

Malaysia
2,169 real chained 2019 US$
in 2020
Suriname
2,252 real chained 2019 US$
in 2020
Malaysia rank
22nd
Suriname rank
21st

Nonrenewable natural capital per capita, oil over time

  • Malaysia
  • Suriname
2.0k3.0k4.0k5.0k6.0k199520072020

How they compare

Suriname currently reports 2,252 real chained 2019 US$ against 2,169 real chained 2019 US$ in Malaysia, a difference of 83 real chained 2019 US$.

The two have swapped places 6 times across 26 shared years of data; in 1995 it was Suriname ahead.

Malaysia ranks 22nd and Suriname ranks 21st of 145 countries.

Across the 4 decades both report, Malaysia averaged higher in 1 and Suriname in 3.

Head to head by decade

Decade Malaysia Suriname Difference Ahead
1990s 2,895 real chained 2019 US$ 3,073 real chained 2019 US$ 178.35 real chained 2019 US$ Suriname
2000s 3,128 real chained 2019 US$ 3,603 real chained 2019 US$ 475.42 real chained 2019 US$ Suriname
2010s 2,796 real chained 2019 US$ 2,709 real chained 2019 US$ 87.03 real chained 2019 US$ Malaysia
2020s 2,169 real chained 2019 US$ 2,252 real chained 2019 US$ 83 real chained 2019 US$ Suriname

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher nonrenewable natural capital per capita, oil, Malaysia or Suriname?
Suriname, at 2,252 real chained 2019 US$ against 2,169 real chained 2019 US$ in Malaysia as of 2020.
What is the difference in nonrenewable natural capital per capita, oil between Malaysia and Suriname?
83 real chained 2019 US$, with Suriname ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Malaysia and Suriname?
26 years are reported by both, from 1995 to 2020.
How do Malaysia and Suriname rank globally for nonrenewable natural capital per capita, oil?
Malaysia ranks 22nd and Suriname ranks 21st of 145 countries.
Where does this data come from?
World Bank. 2021. The Changing Wealth of Nations 2021: Managing Assets for the Future. Washington, DC: World Bank. doi:10.1596/978-1-4648-1590-4, published as Nonrenewable natural capital per capita, oil (real chained 2019 US$). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Malaysia vs Suriname: Nonrenewable natural capital per capita, oil. Statizoid, drawing on World Bank. 2021. The Changing Wealth of Nations 2021: Managing Assets for the Future. Washington, DC: World Bank. doi:10.1596/978-1-4648-1590-4. Retrieved 01 September 2026, from https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/nonrenewable-natural-capital-per-capita-oil-real-chained-2019-us/malaysia/suriname/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/nonrenewable-natural-capital-per-capita-oil-real-chained-2019-us/malaysia/suriname/">Malaysia vs Suriname: Nonrenewable natural capital per capita, oil</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Nonrenewable natural capital per capita, oil (real chained 2019 US$)
Unit
real chained 2019 US$
Source
World Bank. 2021. The Changing Wealth of Nations 2021: Managing Assets for the Future. Washington, DC: World Bank. doi:10.1596/978-1-4648-1590-4
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
145 places, 3,729 data points, 1995–2020
Last refreshed

Natural capital includes the valuation of renewable and nonrenewable natural capital. Renewable natural capital includes agricultural land (cropland and pastureland), forests (timber, and three ecosystem services: water, recretion and non-wood forest products), protected areas, mangroves and fisheries. Nonrenewable natural capital includes fossil fuel energy (oil, gas, hard and soft coal) and minerals (bauxite, copper, gold, iron ore, lead, nickel, phosphate, silver, tin, and zinc),Values are measured at market exchange rates in constant 2018 US dollars, using a country-specific GDP deflator.