Ecuador vs Suriname: Nonrenewable natural capital per capita, oil

Ecuador
2,687 real chained 2019 US$
in 2020
Suriname
2,252 real chained 2019 US$
in 2020
Ecuador rank
18th
Suriname rank
21st

Nonrenewable natural capital per capita, oil over time

  • Ecuador
  • Suriname
2.0k4.0k6.0k8.0k10.0k199520072020

How they compare

Ecuador currently reports 2,687 real chained 2019 US$ against 2,252 real chained 2019 US$ in Suriname, a difference of 435 real chained 2019 US$.

That makes Ecuador's figure about 1.2 times Suriname's.

Across all 26 years both countries report, Ecuador has been ahead every year.

Ecuador ranks 18th and Suriname ranks 21st of 145 countries.

Ecuador has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Ecuador Suriname Difference Ahead
1990s 6,722 real chained 2019 US$ 3,073 real chained 2019 US$ 3,649 real chained 2019 US$ Ecuador
2000s 8,014 real chained 2019 US$ 3,603 real chained 2019 US$ 4,411 real chained 2019 US$ Ecuador
2010s 3,997 real chained 2019 US$ 2,709 real chained 2019 US$ 1,288 real chained 2019 US$ Ecuador
2020s 2,687 real chained 2019 US$ 2,252 real chained 2019 US$ 434.37 real chained 2019 US$ Ecuador

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher nonrenewable natural capital per capita, oil, Ecuador or Suriname?
Ecuador, at 2,687 real chained 2019 US$ against 2,252 real chained 2019 US$ in Suriname as of 2020.
What is the difference in nonrenewable natural capital per capita, oil between Ecuador and Suriname?
435 real chained 2019 US$, with Ecuador ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Ecuador and Suriname?
26 years are reported by both, from 1995 to 2020.
How do Ecuador and Suriname rank globally for nonrenewable natural capital per capita, oil?
Ecuador ranks 18th and Suriname ranks 21st of 145 countries.
Where does this data come from?
World Bank. 2021. The Changing Wealth of Nations 2021: Managing Assets for the Future. Washington, DC: World Bank. doi:10.1596/978-1-4648-1590-4, published as Nonrenewable natural capital per capita, oil (real chained 2019 US$). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Ecuador vs Suriname: Nonrenewable natural capital per capita, oil. Statizoid, drawing on World Bank. 2021. The Changing Wealth of Nations 2021: Managing Assets for the Future. Washington, DC: World Bank. doi:10.1596/978-1-4648-1590-4. Retrieved 29 August 2026, from https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/nonrenewable-natural-capital-per-capita-oil-real-chained-2019-us/ecuador/suriname/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/nonrenewable-natural-capital-per-capita-oil-real-chained-2019-us/ecuador/suriname/">Ecuador vs Suriname: Nonrenewable natural capital per capita, oil</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Nonrenewable natural capital per capita, oil (real chained 2019 US$)
Unit
real chained 2019 US$
Source
World Bank. 2021. The Changing Wealth of Nations 2021: Managing Assets for the Future. Washington, DC: World Bank. doi:10.1596/978-1-4648-1590-4
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
145 places, 3,729 data points, 1995–2020
Last refreshed

Natural capital includes the valuation of renewable and nonrenewable natural capital. Renewable natural capital includes agricultural land (cropland and pastureland), forests (timber, and three ecosystem services: water, recretion and non-wood forest products), protected areas, mangroves and fisheries. Nonrenewable natural capital includes fossil fuel energy (oil, gas, hard and soft coal) and minerals (bauxite, copper, gold, iron ore, lead, nickel, phosphate, silver, tin, and zinc),Values are measured at market exchange rates in constant 2018 US dollars, using a country-specific GDP deflator.