Colombia vs Mexico: Nonrenewable natural capital per capita, oil

Colombia
953.31 real chained 2019 US$
in 2020
Mexico
919.56 real chained 2019 US$
in 2020
Colombia rank
28th
Mexico rank
30th

Nonrenewable natural capital per capita, oil over time

  • Colombia
  • Mexico
02.0k4.0k6.0k8.0k199520072020

How they compare

Colombia currently reports 953.31 real chained 2019 US$ against 919.56 real chained 2019 US$ in Mexico, a difference of 33.75 real chained 2019 US$.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 26 shared years of data; in 1995 it was Mexico ahead.

Colombia ranks 28th and Mexico ranks 30th of 145 countries.

Across the 4 decades both report, Colombia averaged higher in 1 and Mexico in 3.

Head to head by decade

Decade Colombia Mexico Difference Ahead
1990s 1,680 real chained 2019 US$ 6,355 real chained 2019 US$ 4,675 real chained 2019 US$ Mexico
2000s 897.26 real chained 2019 US$ 2,902 real chained 2019 US$ 2,005 real chained 2019 US$ Mexico
2010s 1,046 real chained 2019 US$ 1,410 real chained 2019 US$ 363.87 real chained 2019 US$ Mexico
2020s 953.31 real chained 2019 US$ 919.56 real chained 2019 US$ 33.75 real chained 2019 US$ Colombia

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher nonrenewable natural capital per capita, oil, Colombia or Mexico?
Colombia, at 953.31 real chained 2019 US$ against 919.56 real chained 2019 US$ in Mexico as of 2020.
What is the difference in nonrenewable natural capital per capita, oil between Colombia and Mexico?
33.75 real chained 2019 US$, with Colombia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Colombia and Mexico?
26 years are reported by both, from 1995 to 2020.
How do Colombia and Mexico rank globally for nonrenewable natural capital per capita, oil?
Colombia ranks 28th and Mexico ranks 30th of 145 countries.
Where does this data come from?
World Bank. 2021. The Changing Wealth of Nations 2021: Managing Assets for the Future. Washington, DC: World Bank. doi:10.1596/978-1-4648-1590-4, published as Nonrenewable natural capital per capita, oil (real chained 2019 US$). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Colombia vs Mexico: Nonrenewable natural capital per capita, oil. Statizoid, drawing on World Bank. 2021. The Changing Wealth of Nations 2021: Managing Assets for the Future. Washington, DC: World Bank. doi:10.1596/978-1-4648-1590-4. Retrieved 28 August 2026, from https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/nonrenewable-natural-capital-per-capita-oil-real-chained-2019-us/colombia/mexico/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/nonrenewable-natural-capital-per-capita-oil-real-chained-2019-us/colombia/mexico/">Colombia vs Mexico: Nonrenewable natural capital per capita, oil</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Nonrenewable natural capital per capita, oil (real chained 2019 US$)
Unit
real chained 2019 US$
Source
World Bank. 2021. The Changing Wealth of Nations 2021: Managing Assets for the Future. Washington, DC: World Bank. doi:10.1596/978-1-4648-1590-4
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
145 places, 3,729 data points, 1995–2020
Last refreshed

Natural capital includes the valuation of renewable and nonrenewable natural capital. Renewable natural capital includes agricultural land (cropland and pastureland), forests (timber, and three ecosystem services: water, recretion and non-wood forest products), protected areas, mangroves and fisheries. Nonrenewable natural capital includes fossil fuel energy (oil, gas, hard and soft coal) and minerals (bauxite, copper, gold, iron ore, lead, nickel, phosphate, silver, tin, and zinc),Values are measured at market exchange rates in constant 2018 US dollars, using a country-specific GDP deflator.