Chile vs Thailand: Nonrenewable natural capital per capita, oil

Chile
99.92 real chained 2019 US$
in 2020
Thailand
110.99 real chained 2019 US$
in 2020
Chile rank
51st
Thailand rank
49th

Nonrenewable natural capital per capita, oil over time

  • Chile
  • Thailand
100150200250300350199520072020

How they compare

Thailand currently reports 110.99 real chained 2019 US$ against 99.92 real chained 2019 US$ in Chile, a difference of 11.07 real chained 2019 US$.

That makes Thailand's figure about 1.1 times Chile's.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 26 shared years of data; in 1995 it was Chile ahead.

Chile ranks 51st and Thailand ranks 49th of 145 countries.

Across the 4 decades both report, Chile averaged higher in 1 and Thailand in 3.

Head to head by decade

Decade Chile Thailand Difference Ahead
1990s 209.51 real chained 2019 US$ 162.34 real chained 2019 US$ 47.17 real chained 2019 US$ Chile
2000s 119.92 real chained 2019 US$ 244.18 real chained 2019 US$ 124.26 real chained 2019 US$ Thailand
2010s 108 real chained 2019 US$ 171.93 real chained 2019 US$ 63.93 real chained 2019 US$ Thailand
2020s 99.92 real chained 2019 US$ 110.99 real chained 2019 US$ 11.07 real chained 2019 US$ Thailand

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher nonrenewable natural capital per capita, oil, Chile or Thailand?
Thailand, at 110.99 real chained 2019 US$ against 99.92 real chained 2019 US$ in Chile as of 2020.
What is the difference in nonrenewable natural capital per capita, oil between Chile and Thailand?
11.07 real chained 2019 US$, with Thailand ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Chile and Thailand?
26 years are reported by both, from 1995 to 2020.
How do Chile and Thailand rank globally for nonrenewable natural capital per capita, oil?
Chile ranks 51st and Thailand ranks 49th of 145 countries.
Where does this data come from?
World Bank. 2021. The Changing Wealth of Nations 2021: Managing Assets for the Future. Washington, DC: World Bank. doi:10.1596/978-1-4648-1590-4, published as Nonrenewable natural capital per capita, oil (real chained 2019 US$). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Chile vs Thailand: Nonrenewable natural capital per capita, oil. Statizoid, drawing on World Bank. 2021. The Changing Wealth of Nations 2021: Managing Assets for the Future. Washington, DC: World Bank. doi:10.1596/978-1-4648-1590-4. Retrieved 27 August 2026, from https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/nonrenewable-natural-capital-per-capita-oil-real-chained-2019-us/chile/thailand/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/nonrenewable-natural-capital-per-capita-oil-real-chained-2019-us/chile/thailand/">Chile vs Thailand: Nonrenewable natural capital per capita, oil</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Nonrenewable natural capital per capita, oil (real chained 2019 US$)
Unit
real chained 2019 US$
Source
World Bank. 2021. The Changing Wealth of Nations 2021: Managing Assets for the Future. Washington, DC: World Bank. doi:10.1596/978-1-4648-1590-4
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
145 places, 3,729 data points, 1995–2020
Last refreshed

Natural capital includes the valuation of renewable and nonrenewable natural capital. Renewable natural capital includes agricultural land (cropland and pastureland), forests (timber, and three ecosystem services: water, recretion and non-wood forest products), protected areas, mangroves and fisheries. Nonrenewable natural capital includes fossil fuel energy (oil, gas, hard and soft coal) and minerals (bauxite, copper, gold, iron ore, lead, nickel, phosphate, silver, tin, and zinc),Values are measured at market exchange rates in constant 2018 US dollars, using a country-specific GDP deflator.