Chile vs Lithuania: Nonrenewable natural capital per capita, oil

Chile
99.92 real chained 2019 US$
in 2020
Lithuania
47.53 real chained 2019 US$
in 2020
Chile rank
51st
Lithuania rank
54th

Nonrenewable natural capital per capita, oil over time

  • Chile
  • Lithuania
50100150200250199520072020

How they compare

Chile currently reports 99.92 real chained 2019 US$ against 47.53 real chained 2019 US$ in Lithuania, a difference of 52.39 real chained 2019 US$.

That makes Chile's figure about 2.1 times Lithuania's.

Across all 26 years both countries report, Chile has been ahead every year.

Chile ranks 51st and Lithuania ranks 54th of 145 countries.

Chile has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Chile Lithuania Difference Ahead
1990s 209.51 real chained 2019 US$ 37.15 real chained 2019 US$ 172.36 real chained 2019 US$ Chile
2000s 119.92 real chained 2019 US$ 39.83 real chained 2019 US$ 80.1 real chained 2019 US$ Chile
2010s 108 real chained 2019 US$ 45.54 real chained 2019 US$ 62.47 real chained 2019 US$ Chile
2020s 99.92 real chained 2019 US$ 47.53 real chained 2019 US$ 52.39 real chained 2019 US$ Chile

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher nonrenewable natural capital per capita, oil, Chile or Lithuania?
Chile, at 99.92 real chained 2019 US$ against 47.53 real chained 2019 US$ in Lithuania as of 2020.
What is the difference in nonrenewable natural capital per capita, oil between Chile and Lithuania?
52.39 real chained 2019 US$, with Chile ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Chile and Lithuania?
26 years are reported by both, from 1995 to 2020.
How do Chile and Lithuania rank globally for nonrenewable natural capital per capita, oil?
Chile ranks 51st and Lithuania ranks 54th of 145 countries.
Where does this data come from?
World Bank. 2021. The Changing Wealth of Nations 2021: Managing Assets for the Future. Washington, DC: World Bank. doi:10.1596/978-1-4648-1590-4, published as Nonrenewable natural capital per capita, oil (real chained 2019 US$). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Chile vs Lithuania: Nonrenewable natural capital per capita, oil. Statizoid, drawing on World Bank. 2021. The Changing Wealth of Nations 2021: Managing Assets for the Future. Washington, DC: World Bank. doi:10.1596/978-1-4648-1590-4. Retrieved 21 August 2026, from https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/nonrenewable-natural-capital-per-capita-oil-real-chained-2019-us/chile/lithuania/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/nonrenewable-natural-capital-per-capita-oil-real-chained-2019-us/chile/lithuania/">Chile vs Lithuania: Nonrenewable natural capital per capita, oil</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Nonrenewable natural capital per capita, oil (real chained 2019 US$)
Unit
real chained 2019 US$
Source
World Bank. 2021. The Changing Wealth of Nations 2021: Managing Assets for the Future. Washington, DC: World Bank. doi:10.1596/978-1-4648-1590-4
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
145 places, 3,729 data points, 1995–2020
Last refreshed

Natural capital includes the valuation of renewable and nonrenewable natural capital. Renewable natural capital includes agricultural land (cropland and pastureland), forests (timber, and three ecosystem services: water, recretion and non-wood forest products), protected areas, mangroves and fisheries. Nonrenewable natural capital includes fossil fuel energy (oil, gas, hard and soft coal) and minerals (bauxite, copper, gold, iron ore, lead, nickel, phosphate, silver, tin, and zinc),Values are measured at market exchange rates in constant 2018 US dollars, using a country-specific GDP deflator.