Cameroon vs Serbia: Nonrenewable natural capital per capita, oil

Cameroon
127.88 real chained 2019 US$
in 2020
Serbia
156.91 real chained 2019 US$
in 2020
Cameroon rank
45th
Serbia rank
43rd

Nonrenewable natural capital per capita, oil over time

  • Cameroon
  • Serbia
100200300400500199520072020

How they compare

Serbia currently reports 156.91 real chained 2019 US$ against 127.88 real chained 2019 US$ in Cameroon, a difference of 29.03 real chained 2019 US$.

That makes Serbia's figure about 1.2 times Cameroon's.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 14 shared years of data; in 2007 it was Cameroon ahead.

Cameroon ranks 45th and Serbia ranks 43rd of 145 countries.

Across the 3 decades both report, Cameroon averaged higher in 1 and Serbia in 2.

Head to head by decade

Decade Cameroon Serbia Difference Ahead
2000s 242.33 real chained 2019 US$ 147.27 real chained 2019 US$ 95.06 real chained 2019 US$ Cameroon
2010s 150.12 real chained 2019 US$ 152.25 real chained 2019 US$ 2.13 real chained 2019 US$ Serbia
2020s 127.88 real chained 2019 US$ 156.91 real chained 2019 US$ 29.03 real chained 2019 US$ Serbia

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher nonrenewable natural capital per capita, oil, Cameroon or Serbia?
Serbia, at 156.91 real chained 2019 US$ against 127.88 real chained 2019 US$ in Cameroon as of 2020.
What is the difference in nonrenewable natural capital per capita, oil between Cameroon and Serbia?
29.03 real chained 2019 US$, with Serbia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Cameroon and Serbia?
14 years are reported by both, from 2007 to 2020.
How do Cameroon and Serbia rank globally for nonrenewable natural capital per capita, oil?
Cameroon ranks 45th and Serbia ranks 43rd of 145 countries.
Where does this data come from?
World Bank. 2021. The Changing Wealth of Nations 2021: Managing Assets for the Future. Washington, DC: World Bank. doi:10.1596/978-1-4648-1590-4, published as Nonrenewable natural capital per capita, oil (real chained 2019 US$). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Cameroon vs Serbia: Nonrenewable natural capital per capita, oil. Statizoid, drawing on World Bank. 2021. The Changing Wealth of Nations 2021: Managing Assets for the Future. Washington, DC: World Bank. doi:10.1596/978-1-4648-1590-4. Retrieved 29 August 2026, from https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/nonrenewable-natural-capital-per-capita-oil-real-chained-2019-us/cameroon/serbia/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/nonrenewable-natural-capital-per-capita-oil-real-chained-2019-us/cameroon/serbia/">Cameroon vs Serbia: Nonrenewable natural capital per capita, oil</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Nonrenewable natural capital per capita, oil (real chained 2019 US$)
Unit
real chained 2019 US$
Source
World Bank. 2021. The Changing Wealth of Nations 2021: Managing Assets for the Future. Washington, DC: World Bank. doi:10.1596/978-1-4648-1590-4
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
145 places, 3,729 data points, 1995–2020
Last refreshed

Natural capital includes the valuation of renewable and nonrenewable natural capital. Renewable natural capital includes agricultural land (cropland and pastureland), forests (timber, and three ecosystem services: water, recretion and non-wood forest products), protected areas, mangroves and fisheries. Nonrenewable natural capital includes fossil fuel energy (oil, gas, hard and soft coal) and minerals (bauxite, copper, gold, iron ore, lead, nickel, phosphate, silver, tin, and zinc),Values are measured at market exchange rates in constant 2018 US dollars, using a country-specific GDP deflator.