Belarus vs Papua New Guinea: Nonrenewable natural capital per capita, oil

Belarus
352.13 real chained 2019 US$
in 2020
Papua New Guinea
336 real chained 2019 US$
in 2020
Belarus rank
36th
Papua New Guinea rank
37th

Nonrenewable natural capital per capita, oil over time

  • Belarus
  • Papua New Guinea
05001.0k1.5k199520072020

How they compare

Belarus currently reports 352.13 real chained 2019 US$ against 336 real chained 2019 US$ in Papua New Guinea, a difference of 16.13 real chained 2019 US$.

The two have swapped places 3 times across 26 shared years of data; in 1995 it was Papua New Guinea ahead.

Belarus ranks 36th and Papua New Guinea ranks 37th of 145 countries.

Across the 4 decades both report, Belarus averaged higher in 1 and Papua New Guinea in 3.

Head to head by decade

Decade Belarus Papua New Guinea Difference Ahead
1990s 326.59 real chained 2019 US$ 1,303 real chained 2019 US$ 976.02 real chained 2019 US$ Papua New Guinea
2000s 340.04 real chained 2019 US$ 773.11 real chained 2019 US$ 433.07 real chained 2019 US$ Papua New Guinea
2010s 349.4 real chained 2019 US$ 376.6 real chained 2019 US$ 27.19 real chained 2019 US$ Papua New Guinea
2020s 352.13 real chained 2019 US$ 336 real chained 2019 US$ 16.13 real chained 2019 US$ Belarus

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher nonrenewable natural capital per capita, oil, Belarus or Papua New Guinea?
Belarus, at 352.13 real chained 2019 US$ against 336 real chained 2019 US$ in Papua New Guinea as of 2020.
What is the difference in nonrenewable natural capital per capita, oil between Belarus and Papua New Guinea?
16.13 real chained 2019 US$, with Belarus ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Belarus and Papua New Guinea?
26 years are reported by both, from 1995 to 2020.
How do Belarus and Papua New Guinea rank globally for nonrenewable natural capital per capita, oil?
Belarus ranks 36th and Papua New Guinea ranks 37th of 145 countries.
Where does this data come from?
World Bank. 2021. The Changing Wealth of Nations 2021: Managing Assets for the Future. Washington, DC: World Bank. doi:10.1596/978-1-4648-1590-4, published as Nonrenewable natural capital per capita, oil (real chained 2019 US$). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Belarus vs Papua New Guinea: Nonrenewable natural capital per capita, oil. Statizoid, drawing on World Bank. 2021. The Changing Wealth of Nations 2021: Managing Assets for the Future. Washington, DC: World Bank. doi:10.1596/978-1-4648-1590-4. Retrieved 03 September 2026, from https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/nonrenewable-natural-capital-per-capita-oil-real-chained-2019-us/belarus/papua-new-guinea/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/nonrenewable-natural-capital-per-capita-oil-real-chained-2019-us/belarus/papua-new-guinea/">Belarus vs Papua New Guinea: Nonrenewable natural capital per capita, oil</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Nonrenewable natural capital per capita, oil (real chained 2019 US$)
Unit
real chained 2019 US$
Source
World Bank. 2021. The Changing Wealth of Nations 2021: Managing Assets for the Future. Washington, DC: World Bank. doi:10.1596/978-1-4648-1590-4
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
145 places, 3,729 data points, 1995–2020
Last refreshed

Natural capital includes the valuation of renewable and nonrenewable natural capital. Renewable natural capital includes agricultural land (cropland and pastureland), forests (timber, and three ecosystem services: water, recretion and non-wood forest products), protected areas, mangroves and fisheries. Nonrenewable natural capital includes fossil fuel energy (oil, gas, hard and soft coal) and minerals (bauxite, copper, gold, iron ore, lead, nickel, phosphate, silver, tin, and zinc),Values are measured at market exchange rates in constant 2018 US dollars, using a country-specific GDP deflator.