Philippines vs Slovakia: Nonrenewable natural capital per capita, oil
Philippines
0 current US$
in 2020
Slovakia
0 current US$
in 2020
Philippines rank
58th
Slovakia rank
58th
Nonrenewable natural capital per capita, oil over time
- Philippines
- Slovakia
How they compare
Philippines currently reports 0 current US$ against 0 current US$ in Slovakia, a difference of 0 current US$.
The two have swapped places 4 times across 26 shared years of data; in 1995 it was Slovakia ahead.
Philippines ranks 58th and Slovakia ranks 58th of 86 countries.
Across the 4 decades both report, Philippines averaged higher in 1 and Slovakia in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Philippines | Slovakia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 0 current US$ | 15.53 current US$ | 15.53 current US$ | Slovakia |
| 2000s | 2.56 current US$ | 31.35 current US$ | 28.8 current US$ | Slovakia |
| 2010s | 17.18 current US$ | 8.09 current US$ | 9.09 current US$ | Philippines |
| 2020s | 0 current US$ | 0 current US$ | 0 current US$ | — |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher nonrenewable natural capital per capita, oil, Philippines or Slovakia?
- Philippines, at 0 current US$ against 0 current US$ in Slovakia as of 2020.
- What is the difference in nonrenewable natural capital per capita, oil between Philippines and Slovakia?
- 0 current US$, with Philippines ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Philippines and Slovakia?
- 26 years are reported by both, from 1995 to 2020.
- How do Philippines and Slovakia rank globally for nonrenewable natural capital per capita, oil?
- Philippines ranks 58th and Slovakia ranks 58th of 86 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Nonrenewable natural capital per capita, oil (current US$). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.