Estonia vs Suriname: Nonrenewable natural capital per capita, oil
Estonia
2,504 current US$
in 2020
Suriname
943.51 current US$
in 2020
Estonia rank
13th
Suriname rank
16th
Nonrenewable natural capital per capita, oil over time
- Estonia
- Suriname
How they compare
Estonia currently reports 2,504 current US$ against 943.51 current US$ in Suriname, a difference of 1,560 current US$.
That makes Estonia's figure about 2.7 times Suriname's.
The two have swapped places 4 times across 26 shared years of data; in 1995 it was Estonia ahead.
Estonia ranks 13th and Suriname ranks 16th of 86 countries.
Across the 4 decades both report, Estonia averaged higher in 2 and Suriname in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Estonia | Suriname | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 1,040 current US$ | 425.45 current US$ | 615.01 current US$ | Estonia |
| 2000s | 2,680 current US$ | 3,309 current US$ | 629.18 current US$ | Suriname |
| 2010s | 3,881 current US$ | 3,966 current US$ | 85.07 current US$ | Suriname |
| 2020s | 2,504 current US$ | 943.51 current US$ | 1,560 current US$ | Estonia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher nonrenewable natural capital per capita, oil, Estonia or Suriname?
- Estonia, at 2,504 current US$ against 943.51 current US$ in Suriname as of 2020.
- What is the difference in nonrenewable natural capital per capita, oil between Estonia and Suriname?
- 1,560 current US$, with Estonia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Estonia and Suriname?
- 26 years are reported by both, from 1995 to 2020.
- How do Estonia and Suriname rank globally for nonrenewable natural capital per capita, oil?
- Estonia ranks 13th and Suriname ranks 16th of 86 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Nonrenewable natural capital per capita, oil (current US$). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.