Congo vs Estonia: Nonrenewable natural capital per capita, oil
Congo
4,794 current US$
in 2020
Estonia
2,504 current US$
in 2020
Congo rank
10th
Estonia rank
13th
Nonrenewable natural capital per capita, oil over time
- Congo
- Estonia
How they compare
Congo currently reports 4,794 current US$ against 2,504 current US$ in Estonia, a difference of 2,290 current US$.
That makes Congo's figure about 1.9 times Estonia's.
Across all 26 years both countries report, Congo has been ahead every year.
Congo ranks 10th and Estonia ranks 13th of 86 countries.
Congo has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Congo | Estonia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 3,910 current US$ | 1,040 current US$ | 2,870 current US$ | Congo |
| 2000s | 11,356 current US$ | 2,680 current US$ | 8,676 current US$ | Congo |
| 2010s | 15,009 current US$ | 3,881 current US$ | 11,128 current US$ | Congo |
| 2020s | 4,794 current US$ | 2,504 current US$ | 2,290 current US$ | Congo |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher nonrenewable natural capital per capita, oil, Congo or Estonia?
- Congo, at 4,794 current US$ against 2,504 current US$ in Estonia as of 2020.
- What is the difference in nonrenewable natural capital per capita, oil between Congo and Estonia?
- 2,290 current US$, with Congo ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Congo and Estonia?
- 26 years are reported by both, from 1995 to 2020.
- How do Congo and Estonia rank globally for nonrenewable natural capital per capita, oil?
- Congo ranks 10th and Estonia ranks 13th of 86 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Nonrenewable natural capital per capita, oil (current US$). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.