China vs Serbia: Nonrenewable natural capital per capita, oil
China
157.32 current US$
in 2020
Serbia
198.97 current US$
in 2020
China rank
31st
Serbia rank
29th
Nonrenewable natural capital per capita, oil over time
- China
- Serbia
How they compare
Serbia currently reports 198.97 current US$ against 157.32 current US$ in China, a difference of 41.65 current US$.
That makes Serbia's figure about 1.3 times China's.
The two have swapped places 5 times across 14 shared years of data; in 2007 it was China ahead.
China ranks 31st and Serbia ranks 29th of 86 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, China averaged higher in 2 and Serbia in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | China | Serbia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 673.92 current US$ | 469.44 current US$ | 204.48 current US$ | China |
| 2010s | 662.87 current US$ | 472.06 current US$ | 190.81 current US$ | China |
| 2020s | 157.32 current US$ | 198.97 current US$ | 41.64 current US$ | Serbia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher nonrenewable natural capital per capita, oil, China or Serbia?
- Serbia, at 198.97 current US$ against 157.32 current US$ in China as of 2020.
- What is the difference in nonrenewable natural capital per capita, oil between China and Serbia?
- 41.65 current US$, with Serbia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for China and Serbia?
- 14 years are reported by both, from 2007 to 2020.
- How do China and Serbia rank globally for nonrenewable natural capital per capita, oil?
- China ranks 31st and Serbia ranks 29th of 86 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Nonrenewable natural capital per capita, oil (current US$). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.