Australia vs Suriname: Nonrenewable natural capital per capita, oil
Australia
917.9 current US$
in 2020
Suriname
943.51 current US$
in 2020
Australia rank
17th
Suriname rank
16th
Nonrenewable natural capital per capita, oil over time
- Australia
- Suriname
How they compare
Suriname currently reports 943.51 current US$ against 917.9 current US$ in Australia, a difference of 25.61 current US$.
The two have swapped places 5 times across 26 shared years of data; in 1995 it was Australia ahead.
Australia ranks 17th and Suriname ranks 16th of 86 countries.
Across the 4 decades both report, Australia averaged higher in 1 and Suriname in 3.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Australia | Suriname | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 935.34 current US$ | 425.45 current US$ | 509.89 current US$ | Australia |
| 2000s | 2,787 current US$ | 3,309 current US$ | 522.05 current US$ | Suriname |
| 2010s | 3,343 current US$ | 3,966 current US$ | 623 current US$ | Suriname |
| 2020s | 917.9 current US$ | 943.51 current US$ | 25.61 current US$ | Suriname |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher nonrenewable natural capital per capita, oil, Australia or Suriname?
- Suriname, at 943.51 current US$ against 917.9 current US$ in Australia as of 2020.
- What is the difference in nonrenewable natural capital per capita, oil between Australia and Suriname?
- 25.61 current US$, with Suriname ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Australia and Suriname?
- 26 years are reported by both, from 1995 to 2020.
- How do Australia and Suriname rank globally for nonrenewable natural capital per capita, oil?
- Australia ranks 17th and Suriname ranks 16th of 86 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Nonrenewable natural capital per capita, oil (current US$). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.